Page 18 - AquaMark 3
AquaMark 3The latest graphics cards on the market are almost all DirectX 9 compatible these days and we also see an increasing number of games utilizing the new DX9 features. To be able to see how well a graphics cards is performing in this new, challenging DirectX 9 environment, AquaMark was developed.
The AquaMark3 benchmark delivers scores for specific hardware components as well as an overall score for the entire system. AquaMark3 is highly qualified to meet the needs of gamers because it's as close as possible to a typical game application. The AquaMark benchmarking series is based directly on the huge code and data base of the AquaNox games and the underlying krass game engine."
In the past we have used AquaMark 2.3 in our benchmark suite and although still a reputable application, Massive figured it was time for the next best thing. This is AquaMark 3, a benchmark that will utilize some of the finest DirectX 9 capabilities like Pixel and Vertex Shaders 2.0 and yet is by far not as Shader dependant as Half-Life 2 is, for example. You will notice that in the overall results later in this article.
AquaMark 3 is not solely a DirectX9 benchmark though; if you are working with a DirectX 8 or 7 compatible graphics card, you will still be able to use it, just with a lot of graphical features missing. Make no mistake, AquaMark3 is a DirectX 9 benchmark. But since it's based on a real game engine it has fallbacks to DirectX 8 and even DirectX 7 making this software not a 100% DX9 benchmark.
Download: Aquamark 3 (63 MB)
AquaMark 3 | 800x600 | 1024x768 | 1280x1024 | 1600x1200 |
FX 5600 | 24 | 21 | 17 | 13 |
9600 256 | 29 | 23 | 17 | 13 |
Creative R9600 | 29 | 23 | 17 | 13 |
9600 Pro | 31 | 25 | 19 | 14 |
FX 5700 | 36 | 30 | 23 | 18 |
R9800XT | 41 | 35 | 26 | 20 |
FX 5700 Ultra | 41 | 35 | 27 | 21 |
9700 Pro | 46 | 41 | 33 | 26 |
9800 Pro | 49 | 45 | 38 | 30 |
9800 Pro | 50 | 44 | 38 | 30 |
5900 XT GALAXY | 50 | 47 | 43 | 36 |
9800XT | 51 | 46 | 40 | 33 |
FX 5950 Ultra | 53 | 49 | 45 | 38 |
5950U | 53 | 50 | 43 | 36 |
6800U | 62 | 60 | 55 | 50 |
3.4 GHz | 67 | 64 | 59 | 52 |
Trilinear Opt Off | 60 | 58 | 54 | 49 |
Right, let's throw in some other graphics cards also. Of course on top of the line, the 6800 Ultra which at default handles 50 FPS even at 1600x1200. Let's have a look how she behaves with IQ settings enabled.
4xAA 8xAF | 800x600 | 1024x768 | 1280x1024 | 1600x1200 |
FX 5600 | 16 | 13 | 9 | 7 |
9600 256 | 21 | 16 | 12 | 8 |
FX 5700 | 22 | 17 | 12 | 9 |
9600 Pro | 24 | 18 | 13 | 9 |
FX 5700 Ultra | 26 | 19 | 14 | 11 |
R9600XT | 32 | 25 | 19 | 12 |
5900 XT | 33 | 26 | 19 | 15 |
FX 5900 Ultra | 39 | 31 | 23 | 17 |
9700 Pro | 39 | 32 | 24 | 19 |
FX 5950 Ultra | 40 | 32 | 24 | 18 |
9800 Pro | 43 | 36 | 27 | 21 |
9800XT | 45 | 39 | 30 | 23 |
6800U | 57 | 51 | 42 | 34 |
3.4 GHz | 60 | 53 | 43 | 34 |
16xAF | 58 | 55 | 49 | 43 |
Again really nice numbers. BTW - do not get confused with the 16xAF setting. The results is so high because there's no AA enabled in that test.