#5347338

Witcher29

2016-10-18 08:56

Now things gets interesting from samsung, still not hyped for a curved screen and that weird resolution tho. If they bring 2560x1440 with no curve @ 144 hz i buy one, even if it has no gsync i dont care.

#5347356

Ryffryder

2016-10-18 09:45

No vesa...

#5347415

xrodney

2016-10-18 13:11

I would love this with 4k (16:9) and in 37-43 inches range.

#5347438

Ryu5uzaku

2016-10-18 14:27

If you AMD set this might be the best monitor to buy.

#5347439

cryohellinc

2016-10-18 14:29

Why no G-sync?

#5347676

MaCk0y

2016-10-18 22:50

It supports VESA 100x100 mm.

#5347687

Agonist

2016-10-18 23:34

Now things gets interesting from samsung, still not hyped for a curved screen and that weird resolution tho. If they bring 2560x1440 with no curve @ 144 hz i buy one, even if it has no gsync i dont care.

Guess you have no idea what 21:9 is then if you feel its weird. 2560x1080 and 3440x1440. The curve is best for 21:9. 16:9 with curve is terrible.

I would love this with 4k (16:9) and in 37-43 inches range.

They already have tons of 4k monitors like this, Just not the HZ range.

Especially for that price...... Nothing special here. I do feel that 2017 needs to be the year of the monitor/SUHD TV's. At least that is what I am hoping. I've been holding out on a monitor since my purchase of three BenQ 120hz over four years ago.

A 34 inch 1440p 21:9 up to 100hz is nothing special? Yea ok. And the price for this actually quite good for this type of monitor. My 29 Inch LG 21:9 freesync 2560x1080 60hz was $700+ when I bought in Nov 2015.

#5347704

xrodney

2016-10-19 00:44

They already have tons of 4k monitors like this, Just not the HZ range.

I dont think so. There is Seiki Pro, Philips DM4065UC which a re more or less TVs, one DELL IPS, 2 models from Iiyama plus maybe few more Chinese cheap monitors, but other then that its prety nonexistent. And none of them is realy good and most lacks a lot of features.