Rumor: NVIDIA could unveil a GeForce GTX 1630 this month (updated)

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Rumor: NVIDIA could unveil a GeForce GTX 1630 this month (updated) on our message forum
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/282/282473.jpg
280eur retail I bet
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/248/248291.jpg
AMD and nvidia fiercely competing to release worthless GPUs in 2022.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/250/250418.jpg
cucaulay malkin:

280eur retail I bet
For a card that's only good for facebook and e-mail.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/282/282473.jpg
Silva:

For a card that's only good for facebook and e-mail.
can be oc'd to run zoom
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/80/80129.jpg
Silva:

For a card that's only good for facebook and e-mail.
Honestly I want it. I took my 3900x and put it into a work desktop, picked up a GT710? I think something like that and shoved it in here and its terrible. Office apps lag. Opening youtube at anything over 1080p lags. I never realized most basic desktop software needs acceleration to run smoothly now. I was thinking of getting an RX550 to replace it as I can find them for $180ish but that's still kind of expensive for something to just run desktop apps. All the 1030's I see that are cheap only have 2 outputs.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
And i thought gtx cards are a history.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/246/246171.jpg
There hasn't been much of a need for extra low-end models because most iGPUs these days offer better performance with less noise and a lower cost. You can get decently powerful CPUs with iGPUs these days, like the 12900K.
Denial:

Honestly I want it. I took my 3900x and put it into a work desktop, picked up a GT710? I think something like that and shoved it in here and its terrible. Office apps lag. Opening youtube at anything over 1080p lags. I never realized most basic desktop software needs acceleration to run smoothly now. I was thinking of getting an RX550 to replace it as I can find them for $180ish but that's still kind of expensive for something to just run desktop apps. All the 1030's I see that are cheap only have 2 outputs.
Have you looked into low-end workstation GPUs? Those tend to have 3+ outputs, are relatively cheap, and are often passively cooled.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/282/282473.jpg
Denial:

Honestly I want it. I took my 3900x and put it into a work desktop, picked up a GT710? I think something like that and shoved it in here and its terrible. Office apps lag. Opening youtube at anything over 1080p lags. I never realized most basic desktop software needs acceleration to run smoothly now. I was thinking of getting an RX550 to replace it as I can find them for $180ish but that's still kind of expensive for something to just run desktop apps. All the 1030's I see that are cheap only have 2 outputs.
any intel igpu will run that no problem yet there was never any mention of added value for intel cpus when comparing against amd that's frankly a shame on reviewers since a dgpu for the same will cost you half your processor,and it still won't play modern games.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/132/132389.jpg
Horus-Anhur:

AMD and nvidia fiercely competing to release worthless GPUs in 2022.
Don't worry, as soon as Intelmao manage to get their shit together they'll also work with noVideo and AyyMD to screw over the GPU market as well.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/293/293056.jpg
Just make them Legacy BIOS support and with HDMI 2.1 + DP 1.4. Will be great for 24/7 4k HDR streaming TV + Second display/office/web used on 10 years old PCs.
data/avatar/default/avatar32.webp
Just go to hell Nvidia, you have become lame!!!
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/248/248291.jpg
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 to feature 512 CUDA cores, 4GB 64-bit memory, launches May 31st
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 will be based on 12nm Turing TU117-150 GPU. It carries different specs than GTX 1650 TU117-300. We are looking at even fewer cores and reduced memory bus. The GTX 1630 will ship with 512 CUDA cores, which is half of what the full GPU offers. Furthermore, the card will feature a 64-bit memory bus, which is again half of the full 128-bit config. The GTX 1630 will feature a much higher boost clock than the GTX 1650 series. According to our information, the GPU clock goes up to 1800 MHz. Interestingly, this might be the reason why the TDP has not been reduced and remains at 75W. The card will feature 4 GB GDDR6 memory clocked at 12 Gbps. This means that the maximum theoretical bandwidth will be 96 GB/s, not a huge downgrade compared to GTX 1650 with GDDR5 memory (the original SKU), but thatโ€™s only a half of what the GDDR6 model offers.
nVidia seems very serious in challenging AMD for the worst card in 2022.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/248/248291.jpg
Undying:

It will be tought. Rx6400 wont loose the title that easy. ๐Ÿ˜€
It's actually a thought fight for the bottom. The 1630 has a TDP of 75W. The 6400 has a TDP of 53W. The 1630 has 1.8 TFLOPs. The 6400 has 3.6 TFLOPs Both have 4GB of vram. The 1630 has a memory bandwidth of 96Gb/s. The 6400 has 128.0 GB/s. But the 1630 has better delta color compression. I don't know how many PCI-e lanes the 1630 will have. But it only supports PCIe Gen3. And I also don't know the price of the 1630. AMD might have to release the RX 6300, if they want to maintain the crown for the shittiest card of 2022.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
Horus-Anhur:

It's actually a thought fight for the bottom. The 1630 has a TDP of 75W. The 6400 has a TDP of 53W. The 1630 has 1.8 TFLOPs. The 6400 has 3.6 TFLOPs Both have 4GB of vram. The 1630 has a memory bandwidth of 96Gb/s. The 6400 has 128.0 GB/s. But the 1630 has better delta color compression. I don't know how many PCI-e lanes the 1630 will have. But it only supports PCIe Gen3. And I also don't know the price of the 1630. AMD might have to release the RX 6300, if they want to maintain the crown for the shittiest card of 2022.
Nvidia is type of company that has to have fastest and the crapiest gpu. They dont give anything to amd.
data/avatar/default/avatar38.webp
Undying:

Nvidia is type of company that has to have fastest and the crapiest gpu. They dont give anything to amd.
PCIe 4 x4 (6400 & 6500) is actually an atrocious decision just where it is needed more (old computers). I am using a Nehalem generation processor (W3690) with a 1650Super @x16 2.0 and this thing is amazing with most 1080p stuff. AMD are just a trash company after doing this (and I own a Ryzen 7 5800 Laptop - hence not a hater per se)
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/268/268248.jpg
@Sentenced so AMD is a trash company because of a bad product ? So pretty much any company more than 10 years old in the technology market is pretty much a trash company by that logic! This is why we are here reading reviews etc, so we can avoid stepping on such products !
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/201/201426.jpg
[QUOTE="Sentenced, post: 6018660, member: 244762" AMD are just a trash company after doing this (and I own a Ryzen 7 5800 Laptop - hence not a hater per se) Yea totally gonna take you seriously after this kinda post.
data/avatar/default/avatar08.webp
Venix:

@Sentenced so AMD is a trash company because of a bad product ? So pretty much any company more than 10 years old in the technology market is pretty much a trash company by that logic! This is why we are here reading reviews etc, so we can avoid stepping on such products !
Yes, that was obviously an overstatement but the last moves by AMD (this and the fact that they didn't give a $hit about doing something about hash rates - even ostensibly) were very disappointing...
data/avatar/default/avatar37.webp
Agonist:

Yea totally gonna take you seriously after this kinda post.
Just go and buy that white "sexy" 6650, kid. Be happy.