Review: GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER - MSI, ZOTAC, Gigabyte and PALIT

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Review: GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER - MSI, ZOTAC, Gigabyte and PALIT on our message forum
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/79/79740.jpg
airbud7:

so they rebranded the 1660ti?.....the frame rates look almost identical?
1660/1660 S = 1408 shader cores 1660Ti = 1536
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/79/79740.jpg
Hilbert Hagedoorn:

NVIDIA has released the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER today, this thread is the placeholder for our four reviews MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING X (review) Palit GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GamingPRO OC (review) ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER AMP (review) Gigabyte GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING OC (review)
Thanks H. Good idea 1 thread to cover all.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/16/16662.jpg
Administrator
alanm:

1660/1660 S = 1408 shader cores 1660Ti = 1536
Don't forget, Ti has 12 Gbps GDDR6 and the SUPER 14 Gbps.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/165/165018.jpg
airbud7:

so they rebranded the 1660ti?.....the frame rates look almost identical?
it certainly seems they'll need a 1660Ti super to justify them selling the 1660ti at a higher price than the non Ti that's for sure,
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/248/248994.jpg
With only a few fps difference compared to the old 1660, this seems as pointless as rebrands, which is pretty funny since this actually has a real hardware difference in the form of the memory chips.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/16/16662.jpg
Administrator
jbscotchman:

Edit: Hilbert replace your 5 with a 6 in your last post.
Luckily only you noticed that 😉
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/16/16662.jpg
Administrator
Kaarme:

With only a few fps difference compared to the old 1660, this seems as pointless as rebrands
Pretty much the same perf at a better price, can't complain there really.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/80/80129.jpg
Kaarme:

With only a few fps difference compared to the old 1660, this seems as pointless as rebrands, which is pretty funny since this actually has a real hardware difference in the form of the memory chips.
The problem with rebrands isn't that they are pointless, it's that they typically market the card as a generation newer. No one who bought the 1660 is going to upgrade to a 1660 super. For people looking to buy a card in the $230 price range - they just got a new option that's slightly faster. That's not a bad deal.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/248/248627.jpg
this card is the most over priced POS available right now i would never consider or recommend one of these with the current pricing of the RX 580 $220cad vs gtx 1660 super $340 cad its 50% more expensive even if u have to spend 80$ on a new PSU the RX 580 makes more sense to me
data/avatar/default/avatar24.webp
Obviously the super version of the 2060 and 2070 replaced just one card, here the 1660 Super has in effect replaced two as the faster memory seems to make up for the less cores, especially in DX12 games. If nvidia added same memory to 1660ti for the 1660Ti Super the difference would appear again in performance, but it would be even more expensive than current ti and getting towards 5700 AMD. Talking of which, AMD need to get the 5500/5600 out now to compete in this sector
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
It would make more sense to just drop 1660ti prices. Used 1070's are below 200$ at this point still faster than all these 1660's
data/avatar/default/avatar33.webp
is it my imagination or is Nvidia spamming new cards only to keep the headlines and battle AMD ? also because they don't want to replace their high-end car which is the only thing enthusiasts are interested in (interested in upgrading my 1080ti but scared of the price)
data/avatar/default/avatar14.webp
Hilbert, it looks like you forgot to change a reference to the Quadro RTX 8000 on page 5. Either that or the text in that section is written in a very confusing way.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/79/79740.jpg
High pricing for a brand new GPU just launched? Who would have thought... 🙄 Wait a few more weeks for stocks to accumulate at retailers before looking at pricing.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/90/90667.jpg
Not impressive in the slightest, in my opinion. They could drop 1660TI prices and make super version to replace the original TI instead of this.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/156/156133.jpg
Moderator
Man if I were a 1660Ti owner I would not be too happy right about now...
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
vbetts:

Man if I were a 1660Ti owner I would not be too happy right about now...
Or even a 1660 non super.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/156/156133.jpg
Moderator
kings:

The market doesn´t stop, something better will always appear at the same or cheaper price. Look what also happened to the $700 Radeon VII, 5 months later the RX 5700XT comes out with almost the same performance for $250 less.
That's different. This is literally the same chip as the 1660, just with better memory. The original 1660 and Ti variants just seem like beta tested hardware. But also remember, the Radeon VII remains its own product for the high end and prosumer, while the 5700XT is tiered for gaming only with half the vram and no FP64