Review: Samsung 970 EVO M.2 500GB m.2.SSD
Click here to post a comment for Review: Samsung 970 EVO M.2 500GB m.2.SSD on our message forum
heffeque
Wonder why some results are so different from Anand's in respect to WD Black SSD / Sandisk Extreme Pro.
Vmhasegawa
Just wondering about the launch dates on page 2, weren't the 970 EVO and PRO just released? The table says April 2017 though
And yep, still reading to see if Samsung gets even more of my money...
Ricepudding
This worth it over the 960 pro m.2?
Or the difference that marginable that you wouldn’t notice the differences in a day to day world?
fry178
And still no protection against data corruption/loss caused by power loss/issues.
Not talking about AC power loss here,
as a ups covers that.
crucial/ocz/toshiba have it, sot is not rocket science and it doesn't cost billions to implement ...
wavetrex
It's funny, HDD's even with their fancy advanced technologies ... PMR, Helium, SMR, HAMR or whatever they want to do next... never caught up with interface speed.
SATA3 (600MB/s) is still over 200% faster than the fastest harddrives.
With SSDs it only took a few years to saturate the SATA3 speed.
Now the same thing happens with NVMe... these new Sammys are basically hitting the limit of 4X PCI-e .
PCI-e 4.0 can't come soon enough !
(Or something else, beyond PCI-e...)
insp1re2600
xrodney
Agent-A01
@Hilbert Hagedoorn
Hey boss, did you get a newer NVMe driver for this review?
Version 3.0.
If so could you post it?
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator
Agent-A01
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator
It can go life once Samung has posted it on their website. Last time we posted the v2 software I jumped the gun and posted prior to their public release, and got a world of hurt from Samsung.
wavetrex
Would be interesting to retest a 960 EVO with the new driver.
Perhaps some of the speed in the new model comes from lower driver overhead, and not just from the SSD itself.
Agent-A01
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator
The Goose