NVIDIA GeForce ‘SUPER’ Product Teaser Video Goes Online

Published by

Click here to post a comment for NVIDIA GeForce ‘SUPER’ Product Teaser Video Goes Online on our message forum
#5672828
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/87/87487.jpg
Hope it's a GTX 1680 Ti with a 10-20% performance increase over the RTX 2080 Ti minus the woefully undersupported and expensive RTX features and tensor cores for £700. Would definitely buy that. £1,100+ for a high-end GPU that is likely superseded by something better within a year is just too much for me personally. I feel uncomfortable paying that much in all honesty. £700 is pricey but considering how superb my GTX 1080 Ti has been and how long it has lasted then that price point does seem much better value IMO.
#5673004
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/269/269912.jpg
So up in the left corner of the "Super" teaser it says Geforce Rtx. So you can extrapolate they are "Super" charging the existing Rtx cards. Thus as someone mentioned earlier in the posting they are just changing the memory from 14gbs memory to 16gbs memory. Thus their "Super" edition Rtx cards will be a notch above the existing ones. So now you can say you have a better Rtx card than all the other poor bastards that laid out way too much money to find out they now don't have the "Best" card in town. NVIDIA "Super" screwed all of you. https://media.giphy.com/media/PxVU1MvRUs3WE/giphy.gif
#5673049
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/273/273678.jpg
FranciscoCL:

Turing refresh with faster DDR6, optimized 12nm+ and HDMI 2.1...
Turing will not be getting 2.1 so long as it stays on 12nm, including +
#5673359
data/avatar/default/avatar05.webp
My card runs at 16gbps anyway............More even. No idea why bother when the best cards all do it anyway.
#5675560
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/54/54834.jpg
410 and 16Gbps my guess.
#5675597
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/238/238795.jpg
To pay the mortgage this month, or buy a new GPU from nvidia? Choices, choices!
#5675601
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/156/156348.jpg
Fox2232:

Hmm. It is always like this. AMD keeps silent, people call it "overhypping". nVidia does their : "Something Great is coming." And people usually consider it as OK marketing. Now with: "Super" It is literally pinnacle of superlatives. And I like that this time good half of people come for comedy factor.
That's pretty good marketing actually. I mean Super gonna be super. It can't be any other way 😉 anyone who will call this not super will be wrong.
#5675719
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
Atleast 14gbps 2070/2080 will get a price drops so its not all bad.
#5675782
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/230/230258.jpg
SerotoNiN:

To pay the mortgage this month, or buy a new GPU from nvidia? Choices, choices!
U are out of options , mate. Go get an RTX 2080 SUPERB ASAP
#5675789
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
Does increasing memory clock even helps with turing cards? 14gbps to 16gbps wont bring that much of an improvement i think, its not like they need more bandwidth.
#5675794
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242443.jpg
Koniakki:

Since the "teaser"(which teased nothing but a popular word with no definition whatsoever) was posted on the Nvidia Geforce channel instead of the main one and we already got 3 different RT-less gpu's(1650, 1660, 1660 Ti), my guess is like others suggested more RT-less gpu's is the form of 1670,1680 and possibly 1680 Ti. Just so they have something "similar" or more directly compared to offer with the competitor's RayTraced-less upcoming gpu's.
That would be pretty cool for me ... I would probably jump on 1680ti if thats 2080ti without RT cores. Well depends on price too but I would imagine they would be cheaper or more reasonable.
#5675795
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242443.jpg
Darren Hodgson:

Hope it's a GTX 1680 Ti with a 10-20% performance increase over the RTX 2080 Ti minus the woefully undersupported and expensive RTX features and tensor cores for £700. Would definitely buy that. £1,100+ for a high-end GPU that is likely superseded by something better within a year is just too much for me personally. I feel uncomfortable paying that much in all honesty. £700 is pricey but considering how superb my GTX 1080 Ti has been and how long it has lasted then that price point does seem much better value IMO.
I didn't see your post before I commented, thinkin' same way.
#5675992
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/269/269912.jpg
nhlkoho:

That Geforce RTX in the top left corner is the logo from their YouTube channel
So what's your point they are super charging you tube?
#5675999
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/269/269912.jpg
Undying:

Does increasing memory clock even helps with turing cards? 14gbps to 16gbps wont bring that much of an improvement i think, its not like they need more bandwidth.
It's just a poor try at a distraction from AMD'S Navi announcement.
#5676582
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/269/269912.jpg
nhlkoho:

My point is you took a small detail from the video, which wasn't even a part of the video btw, to push a theory which you have no knowledge whether it's true or not.
Well , there are four different Nvidia you tube channels, Nvidia Geforce Rtx, Nvidia Developers,Nvidia Gameworks and Nvida Generic. Not to mention all the sub channels. So I can say it has to do with the Geforce Rtx series since that IS the channel they posted the video on. Had they posted it on the developers channel then my point is meaningless. So my theory is sound and yours is not. And BTW I was and am right. SO troll on.

Previous Page

Next Page