NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Reference Photos Surface

Published by

Click here to post a comment for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Reference Photos Surface on our message forum
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/239/239932.jpg
And the driver on the disc :P
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/93/93080.jpg
Titan coolers are avg at best. People who never used it like it.
They actually perform great though with a custom fan profile. Mine Idle 30C top 26C bottom. I never go past 60C in games full load.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242471.jpg
And the driver on the disc :P
And some next-gen and I mean real next-gen games to play with - U4E, Luminous, SnowDrop, Foxengine, and what not, Bf4 or upcoming Witcher3 is not next-gen for me :P.. My 780 still didnt break a sweat, ok apart by some games that just use some lame DOF/blur settings to cripple it on purpose - looking at you Crysis3 & DeadRisng3 πŸ˜€
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/239/239932.jpg
And some next-gen and I mean real next-gen games to play with - U4E, Luminous, SnowDrop, Foxengine, and what not, Bf4 or upcoming Witcher3 is not next-gen for me :P.. My 780 still didnt break a sweat, ok apart by some games that just use some lame DOF/blur settings to cripple it on purpose - looking at you Crysis3 & DeadRisng3 πŸ˜€
+1 about the games, I don't even bother to OC my GPU. Nothing I'm interested in stresses the card :P Could change with Arkham Knight but I doubt it.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/231/231931.jpg
They actually perform great though with a custom fan profile. Mine Idle 30C top 26C bottom. I never go past 60C in games full load.
Yes titan cooler is pretty good. 680 stock coolers were garbage, at 100% fan couldnt keep it from hitting 70c, non issue for the titan.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/197/197287.jpg
780 Ti was $700 on release last Nov. It is now upwards of $600. Best guess the 980 will be well over $700 until AMD's equivalent comes out. The double VRAM and Ti versions are going to be ludicrously priced, but hey its Nvidia.
That logic doesn't make any sense, the 980 is not a replacement for the 780 Ti regardless of if it out performs it or not, so why you would think it would cost the same is illogical. Every #70 next generation card is either as good or faster then the previous generation #80 card, so does that mean that the 970 (and every #70 card) will be $500, the price that #80 cards are usually? No, it will replace the 770, regardless of its performance. It always has, and always will, so i really don't see why people keep posting stuff like this, it's illogical and based on nothing And no, i'm not talking about inflated launch prices, i'm talking about MSRP
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/55/55855.jpg
GTX 980 Has 2048 CUDA Cores
Not 1920, not 2560, but 2048 CUDAs are powering the new flagship card from NVIDIA. GeForce GTX 980 has 16 Streaming Multiprocessors Maxwell (SMM), which give us 2048 CUDA cores in total. For comparison, GTX 970 has only 13 SMMs (1664 CUDAs), so there’s a 384 CUDA difference between these two cards. GeForce GTX 980 is advertised as GK104 replacement, it is much more power efficient and much more powerful than first Kepler processor. We will cover 2nd Generation Maxwell in detail very soon. Maxwell GM204 has some very neat features for gamers. This post was only meant to confirm there are 2048 CUDAs in 980, hence not the most detailed table below. Stay tuned.
GeForce GTX 980 GM204-400 Unified Cores 2048 Memory 4GB GDDR5 Memory Bus 256-bit Bandwidth 224 GB/s Power Connectors 6pin + 6pin TDP ~175W Launch Date Sep 19th, 2014 GeForce GTX 970 GM204-200 Unified Cores 1664 Memory 4GB GDDR5 Memory Bus 256-bit Bandwidth 224 GB/s Power Connectors 6pin + 6pin TDP 148W Launch Date Sep 19th, 2014 Source :- videocard z.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/80/80129.jpg
GeForce GTX 980 GM204-400 Unified Cores 2048 Memory 4GB GDDR5 Memory Bus 256-bit Bandwidth 224 GB/s Power Connectors 6pin + 6pin TDP ~175W Launch Date Sep 19th, 2014 GeForce GTX 970 GM204-200 Unified Cores 1664 Memory 4GB GDDR5 Memory Bus 256-bit Bandwidth 224 GB/s Power Connectors 6pin + 6pin TDP 148W Launch Date Sep 19th, 2014 Source :- videocard z.
Idk. If those are the specs I can definitely see the 980 @ $500. Its got 33% less cores then a 780Ti and a smaller bus. I doubt it will perform 30% better though. Nvidia is always going to be priced higher. The CEO literally said on stage that Nvidia cards will never be priced lower than the competition because he feels they sell a premium experience with their cards. Whether or not you agree is whatever. I personally find the game streaming and now with my Swift, G-Sync useful. I don't mind paying a few bucks extra for those features but I'm sure others do.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
I'm looking at those 970 specs and wondering, will it be able to atleast beat the 780, lol. Looks like these are 1080p cards.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242471.jpg
I'm looking at those 970 specs and wondering, will it be able to atleast beat the 780, lol. Looks like these are 1080p cards.
With 3.8tflops I really doubt it, I mean it scores less by gpu score in 3dmark firestrike ;D 2048 should make ~ 4.5tflops then, still kinda in 780GTX territory.. If it had 48rops and higher vram bandwidth then yeah but with 32rops idk.. Still 4 more days to go πŸ€“
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
Shame AMD cant deliver 390X right now, nvidia would been in so much trouble.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/200/200207.jpg
Shame AMD cant deliver 390X right now, nvidia would been in so much trouble.
I hope AMD releases cards as well soonish. Good for all.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/115/115462.jpg
Yea I don't think it will be too long until AMD's response... after all we saw that leaked cooler, 1-2 months tops imo.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/116/116362.jpg
Just look at the Maxwell 860M versus the Kepler 860M with 640 Maxwell cores versus 1152 Kepler cores. They perform roughly the same. 2048/640=3.2 the amount of cores on the 980 versus the maxwell 860M. 3.2 x 1152 kepler coresis 3686 ish. 3686,4 / 2880 = 1.28 The 980 will be around 30% faster than the 780Ti. Cya!
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242471.jpg
Just look at the Maxwell 860M versus the Kepler 860M with 640 Maxwell cores versus 1152 Kepler cores. They perform roughly the same. 2048/640=3.2 the amount of cores on the 980 versus the maxwell 860M. 3.2 x 1152 kepler coresis 3686 ish. 3686,4 / 2880 = 1.28 The 980 will be around 30% faster than the 780Ti. Cya!
You can't really compare laptop variant vs desktop. Imo it doesnt work like that just with pure core count logic, ROP count and pixel fillrate/ texture fillrate and vram bandwidth plays a big role here too, nvm raw peak compute performance - so far apparently up to ~ 4.3Teraflops by full GM204 chip. Now with 2048cores or 16smx (970 with 13smx has 3.8tflops), 780Ti has ~5.1Tflops. GM204 is a good midrange performance chip, that's about it. Folks keep expecting too much, its x04 after all, but its nvidia thing now to make a whole range from one chip, they started with GK104 and now they will continue with that >> double profit. Kinda sux for end consumer but what are you gonna do about it, nothing.. You can only skip it and they will sell less :P
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/197/197287.jpg
They post it because the 980 will be over $700.00, I'm 99.9% certain of that. It replaces the 780Ti as the fastest card (if the rumors are to be believed) so it is a replacement (whether you see it like that or not, it's how Nvidia sees it from a financial point of view)
Completely illogical. Where has logic gone? Here puppy, Hereeee puppy! And just so we're clear, i'm not saying that it won't happen, i'm saying that your idea or anyone who has the same idea is completely illogical, it has no basis, it has no reason. History states where things are likely to go, and history does not back you up.
I also note from a post of yours in another thread that you omitted 780 Ti/Titan pricing which is what I base my speculation on.
... Ofcourse i did, because the 780 Ti/Titan is a different card then the 780 of which the 980 is replacing. That's like saying i was comparing a 560 to a 660 in price and performance but i purposefully left out the 670 and 680 and should expect the 660 to be the same price as a 570, not 560, because it has close to or similar performance.....780 Ti/Titan have nothing to do with the 980 Again, this is logic built from history that spands decades, and you're trying to tell me that we should all throw it out the window and not expect what has happened time and time again for the last 10 years, because of....? Right, because of no reason, where's the logic?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/116/116362.jpg
It won't be more expensive as the 780Ti currently is.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/197/197287.jpg
Ahh but recent history does back me up and no one cares about your logic Mr. Spock, so get over yourself.
Ah, so you do not use logic, ok then. πŸ™‚
If the 980 is similarly priced and faster than a Ti, then it is replacing it, simple as that.
Incorrect, a 970, if more powerful or at least on par with the 780, is not the replacement card for the 780, never has been never will be.
No one is going to buy a 3GB Ti (obviously discounting those who are buying a 2nd/3rd card for SLI) when they can buy a faster 4GB 980
Agreed, and this happens with every single new iteration of cards, the previous high-end cards almost never go down in price, for MSRP at least, and are not generally worth buying because of that. That doesn't make the new ones more expensive because of it
Recent history is not on your side. (I'm talking about the cards you conveniently left out of your 'logical' argument because they completely invalidate it πŸ™„ ).
Recent history shows no competition or replacement for the ones that i "left out of my arguement" because they are above highest end cards. They are a New level of high end cards, so unless Nvidia decides to get rid of the Ti/Titan naming and simply go with 980 as a 980 Ti or Titan 2, which wouldn't be logical, then those cards have nothing to do with a 980. It's logic, try using it sometime. You know i'm sure there'd be no arguement here whatsoever if Nvidia had just named the 780 Ti a 790 instead, because that's what it is. a 980 is a successor to the 780, not 780 ti, a 980 ti would be a successor to the 780 ti. Same way as if they had named it a 790 instead, a 980 would still not be a successor to a 790, a 990 would be. What is so hard to understand about that?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/197/197287.jpg
http://static.fjcdn.com/pictures/I_cf03f1_2599989.jpg PS: Do you actually think if you keep saying 'it's logic' that it somehow validates the absolute crap you keep spouting. I only ask, because if you do, it's not working.
So...logic is crap? Cool stuff. Everything i've stated has stuff to back it up, therefore, it's logical to come to the conclusions i have come up to. Everything you've stated has nothing behind it, it's 1+1=3