Nvidia Announces GeForce GTX TITAN X based on GP102 GPU with GDDR5X
Click here to post a comment for Nvidia Announces GeForce GTX TITAN X based on GP102 GPU with GDDR5X on our message forum
tsunami231
I look foward to seeing the price...
Fender178
Very interesting. 12Gb. I thought they would go at least 16Gb and then the 1080 Ti if there is one would have 12gb.
Denial
This Titan is definitely aimed more towards HPC then gaming. Ryan Smith from Anandtech wrote about how popular Titan X is in the HPC crowd due to it being significantly cheaper then Tesla's.
I wonder how Nvidia is going to do the Ti, if they even are.
I'm really starting to think this is going end up looking more like 600 series release. 1180 follow up next year with a Ti model on top, similar to the 700 series.
KissSh0t
I look forward to seeing the "Australian" price...
*awkwardly laughs*
KissSh0t
For reference here are Australian 1080's..
xD
https://i.imgur.com/MlJ9DI6.png
Denial
How sure are we that this is GP102? It looks like GP100 cut down to me. FP64 wasting too much space.
Denial
Where did they say it was GP102?
The blog won't load for me. It just seems weird that they would name it GP102 considering it's essentially the same config as the P100 chip. GP100 is 3840 cores.
Denial
I still don't see it -- although PC Per lists it as GP102.
I also don't see how GP100 isn't suited at all for consumer gaming. The specs of this chip are identical to the PCI-E GP100 board, aside from swapping the HBM2 to GDDR5x.
It's basically a memory controller change, which is the reason why it's got a different chip designation.
Regardless, the point is that there is a bunch of wasted FP64 die space on this card that isn't on the GP104. Which means that Nvidia could refresh with a Ti variant next year with over 4k cores. This is basically the Titan model to the Titan Black/780Ti.
GeniusPr0
about right. glad i ditched my overpriced 1080s
sunnyp_343
NO HBM memory? why
Xuanzang
Unless there will be a second Titan at a later point, i'm really not that impressed. Still no hbm2.
They can't even produce enough 1080's for the consumers and now already a new Titan.
Ryu5uzaku
So current Titan X is 1200-1450€ here. This will be closer 1500-2000€ then. Hah ok...
There will be a nice hole for Nvidia to fill between 1080 and Titan X it seems.
GeniusPr0
They have 12_1 features!
LesserHellspawn
That definitely. Being limited to two cards in SLI, this or the followup generation will be my upgrade path, whenever my triple 980ti are not enough anymore. Will be some time.
Solfaur
It'll be 1500€ 100%. Other than the 1060, which has some competition in the 480, 1070, 1080 and now this Titan X is nvidia covering all GPU segments on its own, and pricing it however they want.
Darren Hodgson
Isn't there already an NVIDIA Maxwell card called the Titan X? Why couldn't they rename the card something different? That's sure to cause some confusion when ordering one as the previous also had 12 GB of VRAM I believe.
And speaking of VRAM... I'm confused over that amount as traditionally new models of NVIDIA cards have increased the amount of VRAM so I would have expected 16 GB with the GTX 1080 Ti having half that. They certainly aren't going to release a Ti model with only 6 GB of VRAM when the GTX 1070/1080 have 8 GB. I guess that pretty much hints that there won't be a GTX 1080 Ti after all...
cryohellinc
Besides rending and playing at 4k, I dont see much use for this card. Its pointless at 1080p / 1440p.
jststojc
Several specs in your sheet seem to be off. On the official nvidia page the base clock is 1417,boost 1531, tdp 250w. In your sheet, boost is missing, base is 1530 and tdp 300.
http://www.geforce.com/hardware/10series/titan-x-pascal
sunnyp_343
Where Nvidia making upper segment and other hand AMD just going down n down.Rx 480,470,460..lol laughing at AMD
sunnyp_343
IF Titan X cost between 1500$-2000$ then having two 1080 SLi is far better choice.but i think this is gonna cost above 1500$ after all taxes in ur local retailer.
