Man, they even included speakers... just magnificent. :eyes:

They need to make a 40'' version of this.

Sorry, but sony offers a full array back-lit 12bit led lcd, with more brightness, widest contrast range, widest color gamut and a 240hz panel. Already calibrated and made in japan, available since spring 2014. Wouldn't really call NEC a leading brand for that one..

60hz? No ty.

You DO know that is with Any 4k content. Has nothing to do with the panel, but the signal. Since no 4k content is shot with higher Hz, and hdmi 2.0 specs only incl 60Hz. Panel can still be 120 or 240 like all sony 4K uhd tvs...

I want this at 1/10 the price! Just so awesome! 😀

60hz? No ty.

Do some research on UHD4k signals through HDMI and DisplayPort before you start bitching. Once you take the time and do so you'll find that there are bandwidth limitations in the HDMI (2.0) and DisplayPort (1.2) specifications. Those limitations are why you can only do 60Hz at UHD4k. Prior to the release of HDMI 2.0, bandwidth limitations in HDMI 1.4 limited UHD4k to 30Hz. The DisplayPort 1.3 specification released in September allows for 60Hz up to UHD8k resolutions (using Y'CbCr 4:2:0) according to this link at Anandtech.

NEC makes some really nice monitors -I loved my 2490wuxi back in the day- and they don't milk numbers like everyone else. They cover their stuff with some good warranties too Probably not a gamers choice these days but that does not mean they are not good

No ty means that I will wait for the 120hz someday:3eyes:

You didn't really give that impression.

@deusex nope. contrast range is limited, there "blind" to colors i can still see on a sony XBR, color banding (and not just a little). just to get better refresh and response times, im not gonna sacrifice other things that DO make a difference for picture quality (opposite Hz and GTG). i have seen them side by side, and they're not anywhere close to what can be done on a good led driven lcd. plus, they only reach half the life of an lcd, so your paying twice as much to cover the same "time frame", all while IQ is reduced... after i showed a couple of images/demos, none of the customers were still interested in buying an OLED... http://www.bilder-hochladen.net/files/big/iyhi-4-a87f.jpg http://www.bilder-hochladen.net/files/big/iyhi-5-e4da.jpg

i rather bottleneck on the tv with 12bit, than match lower bits from signal. plus, they shoot 4k which goes onto mastered 4k BDs and the matching BD player supports 14bit. @laststop always the "content" reason... sony has 4k unlimited service for a year now. youtube/netflix are doing 4K, but the main thing is: sony is doing upscaling to 2/4k in almost every theater in the US for 10y. ever heard someone complaining about the picture quality when they came out of the movies?? AND: what content besides BD and computer are providing a 1080p/40-50Mbit signal?? cable doesnt even match FHD, and it needs to be upscaled, exactly like it would be on the 4Ks, except the 4k have a higher resolution. so on a FHD its a good feat, but on UHD sets its not? and in the 21st century i will not pay ANY money on a screen that can still burn in...

Can you all please stop calling 2160P "4K". It's not and at the very least call it UltraHD 4K, 'the temporary stop-over until UltraHD 8K'. Srsly grinds my gears. As for those pictures, what screen is what?