It says "Core boost clock: 1,605MHz" not 1.785

Since you're talking about clocks, I wonder why my card since it claims boost clocks 1785, during games I recorded consistently 1920Mhz, 61C Top, and 80% Top usage. The game was War Thunder with everything on full, particles density, trees, grass and all. VSync on, 1080p @75Hz. Meanwhile, guys, can't believe how good this card is considering how low I paid for ( 209 euros ). My second choice was 2070 Super but I figured it would be totally excess, and I was right.

NiColaoS:

I wonder why my card since it claims boost clocks 1785, during games I recorded consistently 1920Mhz

The boost frequency is dynamic not fixed, based on thermals, workload, power limiter but also game title it can boost a bit higher (or lower). Historically I have seen NV cards to be above it's advertised boost frequency most of the time.

That's nice I suppose. Older cards didn't do that. I don't have ever to occupy my self with OC.

Well they already have an oc version and a gp version, the gp is placed between the non super and the super oc but this varient has less cuda than the standard super although its not listed on there site yet. https://www.msi.com/comparison/graphics-card/?unique=id1582803899592&compare_list=["R2VGb3JjZS1SVFgtMjA3MC1TVVBFUi1WRU5UVVMtR1A=","R2VGb3JjZS1SVFgtMjA3MC1TVVBFUi1WRU5UVVMtT0M="]