#5558847

alanm

2018-06-20 10:18

Will have to be HDMI 2.1 for it to work without resorting to chroma subsampling above 98hz.

#5558893

Rx4speed

2018-06-20 12:53

Who are they marketing a 4k 144hz 27" monitor to? And who buys this, especially with no current cable able to run those specs?

#5558896

Rx4speed

2018-06-20 12:59

Fox2232:

I would expect it to be handled via MST then. 2 cables, each handling 1/2 of screen.

I did not know using two cables was possible. Thank you. Still, 4k@27" is a bit overkill IMHO.

#5558901

Denial

2018-06-20 13:22

Rx4speed:

I did not know using two cables was possible. Thank you. Still, 4k@27" is a bit overkill IMHO.

There are definitely diminishing returns at that scale but you have to remember that the human eye can see a misalignment between two lines up to 1800 PPD. By comparison a 4K 27" display being viewed 3' away is only 106 PPD.

#5558928

warezme

2018-06-20 14:46

Fox2232:

I would expect it to be handled via MST then. 2 cables, each handling 1/2 of screen.

Why would you need two cables? A small processor could pass the brightness level on to a secondary chip that controls the location and brightness of the minileds or duplicate the signal if needed. Two cables would be to cumbersome and complicated.

#5559091

fry178

2018-06-21 00:06

What a joke. I rather would have individual led control (sony) or even fald RIGHT NOW, rather than mini led down the road.. Since sony has the 43in xbr, might just get that, rather than a moni this time..

#5559123

fry178

2018-06-21 04:11

The tv? So far any content i played on the Z9D, matched the oleds (65A1E/A8F) for black levels. But they dont make anything smaller than 65 for the Z9D. The 49 is at least Fald, so big improvement over any monitor . But i found a couple of 43 lg/viewsonic monis i want to check out first, as they run about half of what the 49X900F costs.