I'm still in doubt towards freesync technology as the few review i had was quite negative compared to G-Sync. 🙁

Typo , : " UltraHD 3840 x 21600 resolution "

Anything below 30" is too small for UHD imo.

If its the same panel of my Dell P2715Q i recomend you guys to hold on because i have a strange inconsistency on the screen, some yellowish areas and very dark edges. The anounced 6ms on rapid mode obviously is much more slower than that because i have ghosting playing any plataform game, very distracting...

I agree 100% I have a screen capable of 4k, but it is a 40" screen, however I do not use it because it only does 30hz at 4k. Anything smaller than 30" is not worth the 4K unless you have it standing right in-front of your face i think.

Having an 1080p screen on my phone, I can see the difference from 720p. The difference from 1080p to 4k is even greater. I'm sure it's extremely noticeable. Of course it depends on the distance from the screen, as you've pointed out. We hold our phones very close, but when gaming I believe most of us stay under 1 meter away from the screen. Which is quite close.

People keep bringing the whole 4K, is it worth debate thing up. Read the anandtech article on eyesight. The human eye can detect a misalignment of 2 parallel lines up to 800+ PPD @ 10 inches. That's like 8K resolution on a 5 inch phone. Obviously there is a trade off and diminishing returns as you approach that. But if you can't see the difference between 4K and 1080 @ 24 inches+ @ 3'/1 meter you're blind -- seriously, time to see an eye doctor, because I have 20/20 vision and I definitely see the difference. Like it's extremely noticeably different, especially in terms aliasing. And honestly performance wise it's like a generation off. A Titan X/980 Ti will be able to play most modern games out max graphics at 50+ fps -- with G-Sync/Freesync it's a non-issue. Hell even now, turn down a few useless settings and 60+ fps easily achievable, even with a regular 980. I think it's crazy the number of people against 4K on a forum about 3D gaming/graphics. It's like backwards.

Interesting, but they should provide all details as LG site states even less than article. At what resolution it can go to 144Hz. Or, is that external 144Hz refresh via freesync and then butchered to 60hz refresh of that screen? What are freesync refresh rate ranges at each resolution. What is screen capable of? (since they state motion240 which seems internal capability to go to 240Hz) Does it have FPR for passive 3D?

I can't see any info about 144Hz. It just looks like 4k 60Hz screen with freesync. I hope it works with 30fps+, but the threshold may be greater, like 40 or more. We'll see when it's released. Human eye can do something like temporal supersampling usually when the frame rate is 42+. It depends on image and person. Anyway you want 4x fps at minimum. Such screen might be interesting even when gaming at just fullHD, as you might read text at full resolution when not gaming. When affordable 4k-capable cards are released, there's an option to switch. And I hope that G-Sync vs FreeSync war will be over by then.