Intel to Discontinue Optane Products for the Consumer Market
Click here to post a comment for Intel to Discontinue Optane Products for the Consumer Market on our message forum
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator
Yes. Optane was developed by Intel and Micron together. Micron produced the ICsRoughly a year or so ago Intel already announced they would separate the development, which is now in hands of Micron, 3DXpoint.
Andy Watson
My daughters cheap HP PC had this in with a 1 TB HDD drive, it was really fast until it ran out of capacity, but for what she needed it was fine.
Then the hard drive died in under 6 months, I used another HDD but even following all the convoluted instructions it would not work. So I just bought an SDD drive put it in and has worked to this day, and never runs out of steam. SDDs so cheap why bother with Optane with all its downsides, hence why they are not popular.
cucaulay malkin
still want that 118gb for os
XenthorX
Remember Star Citizen officially promoting those drives a couple years ago. Well.. 😱
Edit: found it + Damn those drives are expensive !
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/promotions/intel-optane
Ssateneth
Don't know why they want to discontinue it. Optane is arguably a superior product. It's just the most recent optane product was made before PCI-E 4.0 devices were becoming widely available. The latency figures absolutely trounces NAND solution, has superior IOPS, and practically no degradation of performance after long periods of writing. It's a little weak on sequential read/write but I chalk that up to PCI-E 3.0. It's a shame... I hope Micron makes a consumer-level PCI-E 4.0 solution soon. I have the Optane 905P 1.5TB and would like to see an evolution of that soon.
Kaarme
A NAND SSD you can afford is far better than an Optane SSD you can't afford.
geogan
I have no idea what Optane is and nobody told me - their marketing/sales departments obviously failed badly.
If they did their job right someone like me (college degree in computer science + PC tech enthusiast + professional developer) should have no way of not noticing or finding out about some new technology - should have been shoved in my face through all the targeted ad technology in world right now!
Astyanax
nosirrahx
With its price, form factor and capacity Optane never really stood a chance. Out of the entire lineup probably the 118GB 800P was the closest thing they had to a useful drive and it was too expensive.
The 905P M.2 drive was awesome but required a 22110 compatible M.2 port. This excludes all laptop as the only ones with 22110 length ports were SATA only.
The 58GB 800P was the only drive worth using as Optane cache not only was it too expensive, Intel only officially supported the 16 and 32GB drives for this, even though ALL Optane drives work as Optane cache.
The 905P really is an amazing OS drive but the only ones with decent capacity were PCIe cards or U.2 and those were also crazy expensive.
I've got Optane drives in a bunch of systems and the performance is pretty amazing but I really never felt comfortable recommending them since a better graphics card is the best use of $ for almost anyone with a system that already has a SSD. In a work station Optane really is the way to go, too bad Intel didn't even really seem to go after this angle.
nosirrahx
RavenMaster
Optane was DOA thanks to M.2 NVMe SSD's
chinobino
When the M15 was announced as being cancelled back in September 2019 it was already dead.
The Optane M10 only used 2 x PCI-e 3.0 lanes, which the M15 was supposed to improve on with 4 x PCI-e 3.0 lanes but "as sales of PCs with HDDs dropped faster than expected" Intel realised no-one really wanted HDD's with an overpriced SSD cache.
nosirrahx
https://i.imgur.com/MCa857u.jpg
We will have to wait for P5800X reviews to see what 2nd gen Optane could have offered to consumers but the stats are far better than the 1st gen, on paper at least. The 4KQ1T1 write performance "looks" good for NAND but that is the DRAM cache talking. In sustained workstation mixed read/write NAND gets absolutely flattened by Optane.
My current workstation uses 4 905P drives in VROC RAID 0 and this is what I am getting for performance. You can certainly match the sequential speed with NAND drives in RAID 0 but when it comes to 4KQ1T1, NAND in RAID 0 does not even come close:
nosirrahx
brogadget
nizzen
nosirrahx
geogan
nosirrahx
tsunami231
I thought they discontinued optane years ago?