Intel Quad Core Skylake Processor Specs and Photos Surface
Click here to post a comment for Intel Quad Core Skylake Processor Specs and Photos Surface on our message forum
anticupidon
Intel Core i5-6600K at 95W ?
More than i5-4690K ..which is 88 W if i remeber well.
/adds more salt to morning coffee..
/
Kaarme
That must mean Intel is telling all buyers to overclock the CPU straightaway.
These chips look massively unexciting based on this "info".
BLEH!
I guess some of that TDP depends on the size of the IGP as well.
Ryrynz
What? Telling all buyers to overlock? That makes no sense it's designed to operate at up to 95W TDP.
Unexciting? More TDP headroom, significant retooling (2nd gen 14nm core so twice the improvements since Broadwell was never released for desktop) and also 64MB of integrated L4 eDRAM with GT4e graphics?
This is the best thing to come out since Sandy Bridge.
moab600
I hope they will pack something interesting, Sandy Bridge was the last exciting thing.
Undying
Well we still have some time to wait, non-interesting Broadwell is coming first, just the time to save up for Skylake.
This naming-scheme really reminds me of Sandy.
moab600
Intel is competing vs itself, pretty much like nvidia nowdays.
I hope to see something WOW effect, but ya know..
Matt26LFC
Pretty sure thats just for Broadwell, not sure why..
Prince Valiant
Apparently the 6700K can perform almost on par with the 5820K with two less cores and a third of the threads 🤓!
http://www.pcfrm.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Intel-i7-6700K-vs-i7-4790K-5820K.png
Undying
Its clocked 700mhz lower, 5820 would wipe it out at same clocks.
Either way i think those look fake.
Prince Valiant
I agree, my sarcasm was set to the maximum when I made my post :P.
CPC_RedDawn
Intel Core i7-6700T 2.8GHz 3.6GHz 8MB 4/8 35W
Why is no one talking about this!?
35W 3.6GHz 4 core 8 thread CPU!!!
THIRTY-FIVE WATT!!!
This is insane, blew me away when I read this. I had to read it twice. This CPU will be amazing for HTPC/Media Center/low profile gaming PC/LAN PC.
I know "T" model name means low energy/high efficiency and its not unlocked like the "K" models. Still insane for a 35W desktop CPU. If pricing is right on this chip I will 100% buy one for a low profile gaming rig.... (Steam Box anyone?)
gx-x
Soo, that's it? I buy a new motherboard, new memory sticks and this new quad i5 and I get...50% loss on my old parts and 10% speed gain over them for....200-250% more money?
yeaaa....
http://www.littlepurplebarn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Thank-you-but-no-87060350871.jpeg
GeniusPr0
Laptop CPUs please. Bring back the MX cpus. My 4940MX takes too much voltage 🙁. No more soldered garbage.
H83
I´m more excited about AMD´s new Zen CPU than Intel´s new CPUs...
C´mon AMD, show us something amazing! Or not...
tsunami231
6700k looks tasty now just gota wait for the mobo and the cpu to be available to see prices
dito my cpu is rated at that too that 6700k look might tasty and lower tdp too,
and that 35 watt i really wana see what kind performance they pull
Kaarme
I was just thinking, comparing the K and non-K, that there would be headroom inside the 95W for overclocking.
ManofGod
Intel Quadcore = Intel Profit. :3eyes: Oh well, I guess it means another small bump. Guess it would be good for OEM machines though.
stereoman
Intel are probably just looking to make money here, I doubt we'll see CPU's with more cores from Intel until windows 10 is released and even then I think it will take a year or two before Windows 10 becomes mainstream and it's not like Intel are under threat from AMD so I don't blame them, it's real a shame tho I'd quite happily give my money for a six or eight core chip on 1150 socket, socket 2011 is just too expensive right now when you factor in the cost of DDR4, really we need a middle ground here.
drac
Only interested in 6 and 8 core... are there even going to be Skylake 6 and 8?
