Intel Core Ultra 9 285K: Maximum Clock Speed Limited to 5.7GHz?
Click here to post a comment for Intel Core Ultra 9 285K: Maximum Clock Speed Limited to 5.7GHz? on our message forum
schmidtbag
These specs look reasonable. Of course, I take Intel's TDP with a grain of salt but even when doubling them, none of these specs look outrageous or like Intel is overcompensating.
Undying
It has lower core clock than 14900k it lacks hyperthreading. I already seen Ultra 7 265k performance regression compared to 14700k in multithread and singlethread increase is only slight.
If you though Zen5 is bad you gonna be disappointed again.
Horus-Anhur
It's good that Intel is lowering clocks and power usage. The last thing consumers need is another fiasco like the 13th and 14th gen.
mackintosh
Considering the debacle that 13th and 14th gen are and the utterly lacklustre Zen 5, I have zero expectations of Arrow Lake, I can only be pleasantly surprised now. If they get close enough to the 7800X3D in gaming, they can have my money.
Ryu5uzaku
Tho if they only get pretty close to 7800X3D especially if the 24H2 also helps 3D processors then it will be left even more in dust with 9000X3D. It seems AMD gets quite a good boost all in all and 9000 looks actually decent versus 7000 (which it should be but lol).
mackintosh
They'd only be left further in the dust if the 9000X3D strapped more cache, otherwise I doubt there will be much performance difference between the 7800X3D and the 9800X3D.
H83
This is no surprise for those who have been following the leaks surrounding Arrow Lake.
But for this is positive, HW companies have to stop pushing the clocks like crazy only to perform a little better in reviews and benchmarks.
Arrow Lake is supposed to be the foundation of future Intel CPUs, so i`m curious to see what i brings to the table.
Mufflore
I'd like to see how the base 285 performs and power use, vs 265K/265KF.
... oh and vs 9800x3D in gaming.
