Intel Core i9-13900KS 6 GHz Processor Will be 22% More expansive
Click here to post a comment for Intel Core i9-13900KS 6 GHz Processor Will be 22% More expansive on our message forum
fantaskarsef
Yeah... no.
moab600
Is this how they'll compete with the X3D?
Valken
https://i.imgflip.com/2qtf45.jpg
asturur
lol turbo 6 ghz over 5.8 ghz... 200 over 5800... 3.4% max perf increase, if the turbo time is the same.
schmidtbag
What intrigues me more about this table are the lower-end parts. Seems definitive at this point I will not be getting the 13400[F].
So for me it comes down to the 13500 and 7700. Assuming they're priced the same (which at this rate they might be), I'll be going with whichever offers the best performance-per-watt.
w0nderz
anticupidon
Good luck raising prices in these times.
Nopa
Need predictions. 6 GHz @how many E/P cores and how many threads?
moo100times
Maybe the chip is getting bigger to accommodate the extra performance? 😀
Kool64
The FX57 was $1000 USD back in 2005 so I suppose it's progress given inflation and what not.
Venix
Does anyone care about 200 MHz extra ? Especially when the 150 bucks lower CPU is identical and boosts to 5.8 already ?
XenthorX
Maybe in 2years when my body will have recovered from the limbs I sold to get a 4090.
DirtyDee
I like my 13900K, it was a noticeable improvement over the 10900K that it replaced. It doesn't even need to be OC'd as it's not even bottlenecking my 4090 at 1080p in the tests I've done.