Intel Core i9-11900K processor review
Click here to post a comment for Intel Core i9-11900K processor review on our message forum
cucaulay malkin
what do you call BS ? the numbers you see cause yours doesn't ?
if it draws 70w with a 6800 at 1440 then it's neither a 65w cpu nor is 70w its limit.
stop whining about badges,really.
3060 is a good card,your problem is not that 3060 got it,but 6700xt didn't.
though giving anything but a facepalm to 11900k is too much.
bnauk
It's an absolute no-brainer - aren't the intel motherboards a whole heap more expensive too??? I certainly wouldn't 'Recommend' 11900K
£540 is what I got my 5900x for. I can't describe how happy I am I jumped in on launch day knowing now that it completely owns the intel top model.
Undying
Everyones favorite review yt channel 😀
[youtube=_jVAfk4AG3A]
kapu
It will never pass 70W at pure stock. My is manualy overclocked and limits are skyhigh , but it will draw 90W at AVX2, gaming doesn't come even close.
On video you posted that 5600X runs with PBO enabled, not stock 🙂
Please , it's worse CPU of the decade , don't defend it . its UTTER CRAP.
https://www.guru3d.com/index.php?ct=articles&action=file&id=70609
wavetrex
G3D desperately needs new badges, for the full range:
- What were they thinking?
- Dumpster fire
- Meh. Whatever.
- Not bad at all
- Awesomium-256
---
This one definitely deserves an "What were they thinking?" badge.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator
I am getting a little tired of the crap I need to take in my own house based on our awards. READ, do not just look at photos, charts, and awards. Literally in the last words:
You can shave off two tenners if you opt for the KF (no iGPU). You can also step down a notch to the i7-11700K at 399 USD, of course. Regardless, we'll happily hand out a recommendation if you can mentally and physically manage that power envelope and accompanying heat levels.
bnauk
MOD: Removed, this is already posted in this thread. No need for repeat.
kapu
Why not listen to Your own words then , and don't give badges to product that obviously does't deserve any recommendation ( in this case You need "shitty product badge"). . Guru3d means something , and you recommend this product....
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator
Guess what? I will decide what I deem is applicable, not you. If you have a problem with it start your damn website and write your own articles, The disrespect and wording here are starting to really annoy me. Shitty product badge, what the hell are you 12 years old?
vestibule
They may well be cheap, butt?
SesioNLive
While I'm nobody to get attention here I do agree that @hilbert is obviously right on both points, meaning it's his site with his articles and how people put words together can get annoying.
BUT I do have to agree with some users that the guru3d badges "system" (if you can call it so) would indeed highly appreciate an overhaul with some additional badges etc.
I've also noticed on some product reviews here that the badge seems not fitting and just confusing.
kapu
You seem very moved , means there is something on the subject 🙂 It's not just me. Channel that anger on product that deserves good bashing.
https://www.meme-arsenal.com/memes/f3a49a04f6fba5863bf46b4df7daeea9.jpg
cucaulay malkin
what HH said is true,talking to you is like having an argument with a middleschooler.
you gotta understand this is not a YT comment section and we like it that way.
bnauk
I love Hilbert's reviews, one of the first sites I always go to for them. Recommended can be read different ways, certainly recommended if you're an intel fan who has deep pockets and can handle the heat - but I feel the message going out to people really has to be "It's fine, but if you can buy a 5900x, do this". I imagine reading the review would give you that sense though.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator
Hmm, I'd have to think about that. Normalizing frequency says something about the actual IPC, the performance of the architecture, but little about energy efficiency. You can measure it; you'll get the nominal wattage needed for 3500 MHz on all cores, however, in the end, that IPC x frequency and voltage is your performance and relevant energy consumption. And in the end that is what really matters.
Noisiv
Maybe he wandered into News section thinking it's AMD subforum.
And if you're gonna post anything good about competition in AMD subforum, I believe you have to have a court order, yes?
bnauk
Doesn't really change my viewpoint. The 5900x is better, more efficient, more future proof and the same price (well it was for me anyway)
Noisiv
Not going to argue any further because its completly off topic. But I won't let this fly either:
/done here
David3k
I wrote that back in November 2019 when we all still assumed that Rocket Lack was coming out in 2020, and I guess we all know now where the perf-per-watt landed.
Based on what I knew and lessons from history, it was almost a given to me that Rocket Lake was going to consume insane amounts of power. What I didn't know was that it was going to come with little to no performance advantage vs the 10900k. I mean I never thought they wouldn't at least come out on top in terms of pure performance, considering the efficiency they sacrificed to get here. Rocket Lake was supposed to have an IPC increase to match Zen2 or Zen3 but with a clockspeed that would make them pale in comparison.
How then, did this happen??
At any rate, here's to hoping that Alder Lake will bring us back to performance parity with AMD, and/or future ARM desktop CPUs have hardware x86/x64-to-AArch64 translation layers to accelerate x86/x64 code translation/execution on ARM CPUs so we can start migrating to greener pastures.
cucaulay malkin
exactly.
this is the problem.
