Intel Core i5-11600K processor review
Click here to post a comment for Intel Core i5-11600K processor review on our message forum
cucaulay malkin
Really nice for a six core imo. Beats or matches 5600x for a lower price. I'm mildly surprised with reviews,leaks weren't very optimistic,but it's not leaks that count.Performance increase against 10600k is noticeable.I'm sticking with previous gen 8/16 though,and I'd advise ppl to do the same.
https://i.imgur.com/MYaFjqt.jpg
k3vst3r
11600k now chip to get for gaming over 5600x with the price difference, might cause AMD to reduce the price on 5600x as it provides stiff competition.
ruthan
Hmm unless you need some intel specific futures - like better compatibility or better performance in old games or HAXM acceleration as i do, its worse than AMD for normal user.. so only thing which could save it is good price..
Power consumation in load sucks a lot and official TDP vlue is still bigger and bigger joke..
metagamer
meh, still no need to upgrade my cpu for high resolution gaming.
RealNC
Especially with Intel's next generation of CPUs coming very soon. This is a delayed product, after all.
Also, just like with AMD, still too expensive for a 6-core.
cucaulay malkin
still it's a fair bit cheaper
75 eur here in PL,65 eur in Germany.
vazup
Compared to 5600X this one is a decent deal, it looks like I can buy the 11600K right now for 270 while the 5600X is 360 EUR - 360 is way too much for what it offers.
pdegan2814
I was fortunate, the place I buy my parts locally still sells the 5600X for the standard 299 USD. I got one about a month ago, and it's fantastic. Even running a full load on all cores it's easy to cool. If I were choosing today, the power & heat numbers would still make the 5600X my choice, unless the prices were just ridiculous.
TheDeeGee
Gonna have to wait for 11600F or 11700F benchmarks, but performance is probably the same, perhaps 5-10 FPS when it's already 200+.
From the research i done, those F models are the perfect gaming CPUs, at half the wattage.
TheDeeGee
€330 vs €260 here in the Netherlands, 5600X vs 11600K that is.
metagamer
I'll wait for CPUs that will run alongside DDR5 and then go for an upgrade. No chance I'm upgrading before that.
Noisiv
Very decent performance +
Comes with Xe graphics +
Low Cost +
Power consumption - -
OVERAL: +
cucaulay malkin
if it was an octa I'd buy instantly.
for a sixcore it's nice,it's a little bit faster than 10700k in a lot of single thread heavy games.sadly,in some strategy/open world titles it's evident six cores is what hampers performance.it's a tough choice but still,at 260 euros you can choose previous gen 8/16 or this 6/12.I'm disappointed 11700f is 320 eur.Not gonna spend this much on a cpu that I only need for gaming.
@Noisiv
power consumption - it's fine,let's not exaggerate.but I think limiting ram speed to 3600 in gear 1 mode absolutely sucks.it's what I would name as the main disadvantage.
Noisiv
It's more than fine if you remember this is done on 14nm. Near perf. parity with AMD's advanced 7nm parts. But its far from fine in absolute numbers.
I would power limit this anyway: I don't allow my parts to use stupid amount of power - For too many reasons.
cucaulay malkin
either get something that you would not power limit or prepare this six core is gonna require some decent cooling
this thing is atrocious when it comes to power consumption
tunejunky
any six core proc that (damn near) requires a 360 lcs is ridiculous.
the long time lag between mobile and desktop has left Intel at an advantage for years, basically since Ryzen. but now with the large number of AMD mobile options, AMD will slay Intel in the performance mobile section. the battery life improvement alone makes a compelling case for AMD, but in the mobile sector Intel is seen as the luxury brand. we know that it's really the opposite, but that makes it a killer value to tell your friends about. especially as the mobile RX 6xxx comes on market with 8(16) or 12(24) mobile 5600x equivalent.
it's sad that the entire laptop will go for about the same as the AIB gpu given gouging, but that probably will be the way most people will get next gen gpus.
GamerNerves
The power consumption is so ridiculous for a six core CPU, as stated by @tunejunky, that I just can't see much if any appeal in this product. For 200 € with iGPU included you could buy this CPU just for funzies and have great value performance wise, but I think there is more value in having way lower power consumption other than just lesser power bill and the usual arguments. Going green is important, in this climate you just don't release new CPUs that suck even more power than the already hungry previous parts.
I understand gaming doesn't consume that much since the CPU is not utilized heavily, but once you play a game in the future that near maxes the CPU you will consume a lot of power. Also, I'm willing to actually bet that R5 5600X matures better with it's huge cache and will even get minor performance bumps via AGESA updates, so maybe already next year R5 5600X is faster in latest games.
Bad release, but for a seriously low price you could put this into a budget build with strong cooling without much worry. Still, I recommend choosing the greener option to save power on a larger scale and give industry a sign that lower consumption is the ultimate goal.
cucaulay malkin
I've yet to see power numbers in gaming
so far in every review ive seen they're only reporting stress test/mt,and they are not only bad,they are scary for a six core.I wonder how much difference there will be in gaming.idle power consumption is way up too.some report as much as +15-20w extra power usage in idle
[SPOILER="idle"]
https://i.imgur.com/TJdEmzh.jpg[/SPOILER]
found one on pcgh.
20 game average,system power conumption in watts.
yeah,i'm not touching this.+70w difference 10700 to 11700.
seriously,if you wanna go with intel for a gaming system,10700,10850,10900 are still great options at current prices.They're efficient for home/gaming system too.This backport backfired.Performance is good,especially price/perf on 11600kf.But the power it requires.... It's acceptable on 11600 if you're gonna game and looking for a decent value option,but really,10th gen i9 is a better option than 11th gen i7.
11th gen i9 shouldn't even exist.
[SPOILER="pwr"]
https://i.imgur.com/VZgbvms.jpg[/SPOILER]
cucaulay malkin
another reason to go with r3000 or 10th gen 8 cores.see the charts I posted above from pcgh.
10th gen
very good gaming performance
cheap, you can have an 8/16 for 260eur and unlocked one for 290eur
very good power efficiency for gaming/home use desktop
unlimited ram oc
r3000
good gaming pefromance,adaquate for high refresh gaming though not the best out there
still very affordable,280-310eur for 3700/3800 but both overclockable
great power efficiency all round,slightly higher on desktop but within reasonable limits
limited ram speed,but at this price point only 10th gen is better.11600 limited to 3600 in gear1 mode and 5600x starts at 320/330eur.
don't even mention electricity cost here.I nearly crapped my pants when I got the bill,there's been a +50% increase and more are coming.
I'm thinking about a new,titanium/platinum psu,it'll more than pay off in 10-12 years time.desktop power draw is also very important to me,and there's nothing out there that sips less power on desktop than locked comet lake sku. I'm averaging below 10w package tdp in my normal work.
cucaulay malkin
r7 5700x at 350 would be nice.
in the end,whether you like blue,red or green,you should spend your money accodring to your very own economic interest.
