Intel Arc Battlemage G21 GPU Revealed: Specifications and A Few Benchmark Insights
Click here to post a comment for Intel Arc Battlemage G21 GPU Revealed: Specifications and A Few Benchmark Insights on our message forum
tsunami231
so there competeting with x50 tier cards? if it price right it wont mater though which less then 299 which dont see them really doing I could be wrong though
Undying
I really hope Arc and RDNA4 will be competitive or we are screwed.
bernek
tsunami231
Carfax
There should be a higher tier of the Battlemage GPUs that will have 16GB of VRAM or greater and will target 1440p, so this is likely the lower end model.
Based on the Lunar Lake reviews, the Xe2 GPU cores are very strong and capable so I expect good performance from the Battlemage GPUs provided the drivers are up to par.
Ryu5uzaku
So this is like only 20 Xe2 cores going as hard as 32 Xe1 cores or whatever it is. So if they release similarly 32 core one it should be around 4070 ti / 4080 level. So roughly where the new "best" RDNA 4 should land.
The 3.5 RDNA vs ARC 140V they are quite close to each other and similar shader count 1024. Whilst the 140V does have an edge, ARC 140V in the tests has higher bandwidth and AMD higher clocks (in theory). Not by much but still it's decent. Ofcourse Strix Halo will be the king of integrated graphics but it will also eat more powah.
H83
The battle between AMD vs Intel is going to be interesting, if Intel can release a capable GPU.
Too bad no one can compete with Nvidia...
Undying
Ryu5uzaku
valentyn0
i keep hearing this fallacy, amd cant compete with nvidia on highend, then WTF is XTX for, what these peeps mean to say, amd or intel wont bring themselves to produce gpus that consume more than 90% of the total PC Setup, which is ridiculous. actually good for them not stooping so low. now you have gpus that consume more than 2 highend computers combined ! gj nvidia fanboys.
Astyanax