Integrated Xe Intel Tiger Lake GPU outperforms Vega at 7nm from Ryzen 4000 for notebooks
Click here to post a comment for Integrated Xe Intel Tiger Lake GPU outperforms Vega at 7nm from Ryzen 4000 for notebooks on our message forum
Caesar
If multiple "likes" i could give to the above post!!!!
anticupidon
Let's wait and see.
Until real world benchmarks and robust evidence I'll take it with a lot of salt.
More, let's see the pricing...
On the other hand, Intel is fighting back to keep their position in mobile market.
For us the consumers it's a win-win.
Undying
Its coming too late in my opinion.
moo100times
It's good to see competition, but the ipgu performance was rarely the decider on my laptop purchases. If gpu ever mattered, you have to go dedicated gpu .
Texter
iGPU performance is mostly dictated by (shared) system RAM bandwidth/clocks, figures which are missing here for the Intel.
Agonist
Wow, 2-3 fps. Almost within margin of error. Ok Intel.
schmidtbag
Intel is only stupidly expensive when it comes to CPUs and enterprise hardware. Pretty much the rest of their entire product lineup is appropriately priced. I suspect Intel's GPUs will be mildly more expensive than AMD's but cheaper than Nvidia's (if we compare performance-per-).
If GPU ever mattered you'd get a desktop.
TieSKey
Allow me to say it again:
iGPU performance is mostly dictated by (shared) system RAM bandwidth/clocks, figures which are missing here for the Intel.
H83
I think this is good news. It´s nice to have a decent iGPU on a laptop because it make the system cheaper and it bodes well for their upcoming discret GPUs.
Kaarme
AMD has been rather lazy on the iGPU side, though I suppose they were busy developing the APUs for Sony and MS. I'd expect things to change soon enough as laptops are a major market, so AMD can't keep neglecting it for too long. In other words, Intel has had all the time needed to catch up. Of course it has been hard for Intel as it has never been any GPU powerhouse.
