Well... it seems that Huawei won the race to bringing the first true 5G SA compatible integrated SoC. Sad to see Qualcomm and Samsung still selling "5G" SoCs that don't really have full 5G support (NSA).

ladcrooks:

I'm more interested in the side effects, health wise! Conflicting reports all over the place. I'm old but in 50yrs the other generations will get to know 😱 I hate the mobile phone era, look at your average street and you see people like dogs on a lead, being dragged by their phones 😀

Side effects of what. Side effects of people crossing streets without looking because they're watching Netflix through 5G instead of 4G? AFAIK there are absolutely no conflicting reports, or at least none from serious scientific reports. You'll find the "my phone gave me cancer" reports right beside the "Earth is flat" reports, and the "homeopathy works for me" reports. Sun bathing gives you cancer, not TV, radio or phone signals.

heffeque:

Side effects of what. Side effects of people crossing streets without looking because they're watching Netflix through 5G instead of 4G? AFAIK there are absolutely no conflicting reports, or at least none from serious scientific reports. You'll find the "my phone gave me cancer" reports right beside the "Earth is flat" reports, and the "homeopathy works for me" reports. Sun bathing gives you cancer, not TV, radio or phone signals.

I could not agree less. There have been legitimate concerns about the safety of cellular phones and rightly so. I used to work for a company that made a system used to measure cellular phones and evaluate their safety. The system measured the specific absorption rate (SAR) which related to how much of the energy output of the phone was absorbed by the body. Some phones were way worse than others and if the antenna was not extended the numbers were really high. That was back in the analog phone era. Once digital phones came out the energy output dropped considerably and they were much safer. That was because the digital phones emitted energy in pulses, not as a continuous beam like analog phones did. Now with 5G phones, it remains to be seen what their output characteristics will be like. Hopefully, it is not a continuous stream of data from them which seems likely at least when you are holding it near your head and talking. FWIW, that company got out of the phone testing business when their insurance company raised their coverage rates through the roof. They did that only after touring the facility and seeing the phone testing systems. Apparently they were concerned about potential liability.

Gomez Addams:

I could not agree less. There have been legitimate concerns about the safety of cellular phones and rightly so. I used to work for a company that made a system used to measure cellular phones and evaluate their safety. The system measured the specific absorption rate (SAR) which related to how much of the energy output of the phone was absorbed by the body. Some phones were way worse than others and if the antenna was not extended the numbers were really high. That was back in the analog phone era. Once digital phones came out the energy output dropped considerably and they were much safer. That was because the digital phones emitted energy in pulses, not as a continuous beam like analog phones did. Now with 5G phones, it remains to be seen what their output characteristics will be like. Hopefully, it is not a continuous stream of data from them which seems likely at least when you are holding it near your head and talking. FWIW, that company got out of the phone testing business when their insurance company raised their coverage rates through the roof. They did that only after touring the facility and seeing the phone testing systems. Apparently they were concerned about potential liability.

Legitimate concerns does not equal conflicting scientific reports. NASA had legitimate concerns that going to the moon could bring back alien contagions. The concerns were then scientifically debunked and that's the end of that. Studying something doesn't mean that there will be an eternal shadow of doubt, the same way studying and proving a thousand times that homeopathy doesn't work doesn't mean that there's a shadow of doubt regarding its medical uselessness (although very profitable for certain companies that pray on the unscientific-minded). A ton of things cause cancer. People should center on the ones that actually make a difference (the sun, smoking, eating processed foods, etc.) not the ones that have already been proven to be wrong.

There is plenty of peer reviewed science showing that wireless technologies cause various problems with humans. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504984/ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935118300355

You'll find the "my phone gave me cancer" reports right beside the "Earth is flat" reports, and the "homeopathy works for me" reports.

There is nothing more entertaining than someone calling another person a flat earther when it is they who are clueless.

Sun bathing gives you cancer, not TV, radio or phone signals.

Nothing "gives" you cancer. You already have it in your body. Much of the science regarding cancer has been turned on its head in recent years. Read the book, 'An Elegant Defense: The Extraordinary New Science of the Immune System: A Tale in Four Lives'

someone wrote a few years back that the use of sunglasses was probably related to the rise of skin cancers.

ladcrooks:

There are loads of sites and scientist's that do not agree 100% probably the ones that are not commercially involved, no back handers, or fixed studies. Crikey history repeats itself all the time - tobacco was safe to smoke years ago, eggs were bad for you, and for fucks sake, look at the pharmaceutical world. Too much money involved here and not wanting to be technically behind - countries will bow down. I will not be around in 50yrs. Just 2 examples that shows no 100% agreement - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-48616174 https://news.sky.com/story/is-5g-safe-for-your-health-11732308 The above 'sky 'shows where the government has denied independent surveys

Comparing tabacco's fiasco with radio signals. Yep, very convincing. What's next, chemtrails? Also, have you even read the articles you sent? "But crucially, because there are more transmitters, each one can run at lower power levels than previous 4G technology, which means that the level of radiation exposure from 5G antennas will be lower." If anything, you should be concerned about 4G, not 5G. "People are understandably concerned over whether they might elevate their risk of cancer, but it's crucial to note that radio waves are far less energetic than even the visible light we experience every day," And again... better be more concerned about plain visible light giving you cancer than radio waves (not even talking about UV light). -"That light bulb gave me cancer!" while running in circles.

Let's not talk about cancer and phones giving you cancer *tinfoil hat on*

heffeque:

Comparing tabacco's fiasco with radio signals. Yep, very convincing. What's next, chemtrails? Also, have you even read the articles you sent? "But crucially, because there are more transmitters, each one can run at lower power levels than previous 4G technology, which means that the level of radiation exposure from 5G antennas will be lower." If anything, you should be concerned about 4G, not 5G. "People are understandably concerned over whether they might elevate their risk of cancer, but it's crucial to note that radio waves are far less energetic than even the visible light we experience every day," And again... better be more concerned about plain visible light giving you cancer than radio waves (not even talking about UV light). -"That light bulb gave me cancer!" while running in circles.

Radio waves lol. 5G is high intensity microwaves. Did you ever put your phone over some eggs and used 4 g? or called someone? Eventually, it cooks. Now imagine years and years of phone use, right next to your brain. Chemtrails are patented under geoengineering. Contrails evaporate right behind the plane. Patent 1892132 – December 27, 1932 – Atomizing Attachment For Airplane Engine Exhausts Patent 3313487 – April 11, 1967 – Cloud Seeding Apparatus Patent 3410489 – November 12, 1968 – Automatically Adjustable Airfoil Spray System With Pump Patent 3432208 – November 7, 1967 – Fluidized Particle Dispenser Patent 3608820– September 20, 1971 – Treatment of Atmospheric Conditions by Intermittent Dispensing of Materials Therein Patent 3613992 – October 19, 1971 – Weather Modification Method Patent 3630950 – December 28, 1971 – Combustible Compositions For Generating Aerosols, Particularly Suitable For Cloud Modification And Weather Control And Aerosolization Process Patent USRE29142 – May 22, 1973 – Combustible compositions for generating aerosols, particularly suitable for cloud modification and weather control and aerosolization process Patent 3659785 – December 8, 1971 – Weather Modification Utilizing Microencapsulated Material Patent 2446250 – January 4, 2007 – A dust or particle-based solar shield to counteract global warming These patents are far too numerous to post. Here are some key ones relating to the spraying of the atmosphere. Mock it and call it tinfoil all you like. The tech is available to do it and is patented.

Radio waves lol. 5G is high intensity microwaves. Nope, they are low intensity. Did you ever put your phone over some eggs and used 4 g? or called someone? Eventually, it cooks. If it's an egg that never rots, it would take millions of years to cook. But eggs rot, so no, eggs will never rot due to 4G. Here's a mind control patent: https://patents.google.com/patent/US9968780B2/en

airbud7:

Hey, why the bug in your avatar not moving like in the old days?...it moves when I click on your profile though. I'm gonna wait on 6G .....Fast I tell ya!...:p

I don't know... I didn't change anything! You'll probably have to wait until 6G to the bug running again 😀