Gigabyte Pushes NVMe Aorus SSD to 15,000 MB/s on PCIe 4.0 (RAID)

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Gigabyte Pushes NVMe Aorus SSD to 15,000 MB/s on PCIe 4.0 (RAID) on our message forum
#5674704
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/225/225084.jpg
Very juicy but i bet this is one of the reasons why the north/south bridge needs active cooling on X570.
#5674709
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/260/260828.jpg
Reddoguk:

Very juicy but i bet this is one of the reasons why the north/south bridge needs active cooling on X570.
It uses x16, so probably the CPU PCi-e lanes
#5674712
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/156/156348.jpg
Reddoguk:

Very juicy but i bet this is one of the reasons why the north/south bridge needs active cooling on X570.
Well according to Hardware Unboxed MSI confirmed it's because of PCI-E 4 and that the fan will spin only under heavy io on a PCI-E 4 nvme drive. Remain to be seen if it's true but that's what MSI apparently said to them.
#5674717
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/248/248994.jpg
Games would load pretty fast, if you remove the splash screens. I suppose it could help 4k video editing as well, with the 8TB size.
#5674818
data/avatar/default/avatar38.webp
Why is 4k qd1 slowly... or rarely improves? Is it because it is hard to improve 4k speed? Maybe people are clueless and they think seq speed is all that matters? I am a bit confused, but I would love to see improved 4k qd1 speed.
#5674831
data/avatar/default/avatar06.webp
Price?
#5674923
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/248/248994.jpg
BReal85:

False. SATA vs NMVe SSD load time is SIMILAR in load times. And we speak of 6x differences. There will be NO difference with this drive either.
Yeah, because you couldn't remove the splash screens. Seriously, though, the games aren't built for it.
#5675023
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/271/271560.jpg
again, i'm very impressed with the leg work done by AMD in prepping the field for x570/Ryzen 2. the long lead times involved means the partners were brought on at the early ES stage, after proof of yield(s). that is amazing to me as the (predictable) leaks didn't happen... and perhaps more than a degree of gamesmanship from AMD with (maybe) a hint of a disinformation to muddy the waters pre-release. the ability to get the partners to go along without leaks is most impressive, perhaps because now the partners also have bragging rights...
#5675086
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/270/270008.jpg
Kaarme:

Yeah, because you couldn't remove the splash screens. Seriously, though, the games aren't built for it.
You have to realize how many GB you need to load for the average game. Once you realize it usually under 2GB and with sata you get about 1/2 a GB per second it simply doesn't matter much. I can tell a little difference when I switched over to me m2 drive but its hardly noticeable.