GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders review

Graphics cards 1054 Page 1 of 1 Published by

Click here to post a comment for GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders review on our message forum
#5586372
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/16/16662.jpg
Administrator
it's live fellas !
#5586374
data/avatar/default/avatar12.webp
Thanks for the review. Lol performance is even more disapointing than expected. Again glad i cancelled my preorder.
#5586378
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/256/256969.jpg
Not first but who cares. *Grab coffee* Here we gooooo ! Posted a link on reddit r/PCGaming
#5586385
data/avatar/default/avatar38.webp
They could had named them 1090 and 1090ti considering the price range and performance. Sure its an upgrade but at the high cost of €. If atleast they released a card at the same price range of an old gen card (1080ti?) that performed better than that... fine. But this feels like an expansion of the current gen under different arch and the usual Nvidia gimmicks
#5586388
data/avatar/default/avatar29.webp
nhlkoho:

what?
In non of the games tested was the 2080 ti anywhere near 50% faster than the 1080 ti, as nvidia had otherwise claimed. It is roughly 35% faster, just as in the leaked benchmarks. Going from the previous gen x80 ti to the new gen x80 ti, it's the smallest performance increase in recent gens. Only the upgrade from 480 to 580 was smaller.
#5586399
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/218/218363.jpg
2080Ti is a must for 4K users and maybe UW 1440p but not for the rest of the crowd.
Bobdole776:

Somethings odd with a few of these benches. I perform on average 10+ fps higher than what showing in these charts with my 1080ti with a old 5820k. The witcher 3 bench is spot on for what i do, with a average of 108 fps 1440p ultra for me, but ones like wolf 2 which I do around 144 1440p and far cry 5 I do an average of 110 instead of the 101 it shows, something seems iffy. What clocks were the 2080ti running at during these benches, and what was the 1080ti running at core clock wise?
There's nothing wrong here. HH is using FE cards that are clocked lower than 3rd party cards so your Zotac probably has a +150MHz lead over an FE card which does a lot to the FPS.
#5586401
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/16/16662.jpg
Administrator
Bobdole776:

Somethings odd with a few of these benches. I perform on average 10+ fps higher than what showing in these charts with my 1080ti with a old 5820k. The witcher 3 bench is spot on for what i do, with a average of 108 fps 1440p ultra for me
1) We use reference cards 2) you use a different PC 3) scenes differ and vary in FPS You cannot literally say hey Guru3D is seeing 90 FPS, but I get 100 FPS. We test (as much as we can) in the more stringent on the GPU areas. But the test results are always an indication of performance (hopefully as close to your as possible), however since we always test in the exact same scenes, that is the basis of comparison and our reference point.
#5586404
data/avatar/default/avatar27.webp
Think HH is right about his cards sound levels being off. Checked out some other reviews and for idle and gaming sounds are "pretty damn quiet".
#5586414
data/avatar/default/avatar33.webp
Great review. 2080Ti ~ 35% faster than 1080Ti RT useless at this moment DLSS useless at this moment - per game support instead of near universal AA coverage. I know it will get better for both RT and DLSS but caveat emptor for early buyers unless they are already at 4K Honestly, the videos for DLSS didn't look good due to video compression on my system so I won't comment on it further but ~ 20% performance boost is good. Quality I have to see for myself. Can someone compare a 1080 Ti OC'ed vs 2080Ti without RT and DLSS? Lastly, I wish Nvidia released a 2080 Ti GTS... no RT cores for 300 USD less. Maybe no Tensor until they get enough developers on board. That would be a great buy until the RT tech matures to be really useful. Make one kick ass 4K 80-90 FPS GPU across the board... PS: AMD see GTS comment! 😀
#5586421
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/16/16662.jpg
Administrator
Valken:

Honestly, the videos for DLSS didn't look good due to video compression on my system so I won't comment on it further but ~ 20% performance boost is good. Quality I have to see for myself.
Really? looks pretty good here. it was recorded at 80 mbit @ 3840x2160. Internet connection slow?
#5586424
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/156/156133.jpg
Moderator
So no rtx on memes....
#5586427
data/avatar/default/avatar26.webp
Hilbert Hagedoorn:

Really? looks pretty good here. it was recorded at 80 mbit @ 3840x2160. Internet connection slow?
Hi Hilbert, I have 30 Mbits...I can streamed at 1080p via SVPTube so technically, the videos should be downsampled and should look GOOD! 😀 I will use an offline d/l'er for the full 4K file and watch it again but there were compression artifacts in the stream. Also, I noticed the two DLSS streams had a few more hiccups than the TAA streams? Seems TAA was more consistent. This was according to the FPS monitor on the top right.
#5586431
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242471.jpg
Paulo Narciso:

Where's the guy saying that 2070 is faster than a 1080 ti ? 🙂
My thoughts exactly. Was about to troll him but meh not worth it lol 2080rtx ok'ish card, but not worth the price.. dont get me started on 2080ti price and what it offers in return. Also 2080ti fe is one loud mofo.. 290x territory loud and that bitch was loud lol, fail. Edit: msi Trio fails too, temp wise.. only asus strix delivered.
#5586440
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/196/196426.jpg
Sorry but all I can comment right now is... HAAAHAHAHAHHHAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.... Edit: Now that I stopped laughing, the reason for the laugh: The only card that does make a bit of sense in this release is the 2080 Ti, for the low introductory price of ... both of your kidneys. Seriously, whoever priced these things at Nvidia must have smoked something really, really strong. 25-35% extra performance for almost DOUBLE the price compared to 1080 Ti ? Oh, and when you overclock both cards to near 2Ghz, the difference gets even smaller. The 2080 without the Ti and 2070 make no sense whatsoever. Srsly nV dudes, stop smokin' that sh*et!
#5586442
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/218/218363.jpg
D3M1G0D:

I'm a 4K gamer, but I'm in no rush to buy a 2080 Ti. The performance simply doesn't justify the price.
You're sporting 1080Ti SLI so if you've backed that up with a good CPU then you don't have anything to worry about. If the game has good scaling your setup will beat a 2080Ti any day.
#5586444
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/256/256969.jpg
Wow, Hilbert you got the RTX Star Wars demo?! i shall receive my 2080-ti next week, any chance the demo will be downloadable by then ? 😀
#5586445
data/avatar/default/avatar37.webp
Valken:

Hi Hilbert, I have 30 Mbits...I can streamed at 1080p via SVPTube so technically, the videos should be downsampled and should look GOOD! 😀 I will use an offline d/l'er for the full 4K file and watch it again but there were compression artifacts in the stream. Also, I noticed the two DLSS streams had a few more hiccups than the TAA streams? Seems TAA was more consistent. This was according to the FPS monitor on the top right.
Yeah, DLSS had alot more unstable framtimes, with quite alot of spikes. And aside of that, DLSS just looks like it's being upscaled from a lower res, using taa, and a fancy sharpening filter.
#5586446
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/16/16662.jpg
Administrator
XenthorX:

Wow, Hilbert you got the RTX Star Wars demo?! i shall receive my 2080-ti next week, any chance the demo will be downloadable by then ?
Oh mate, I have no clue .... that's NV's call to make.

Next Page