GeForce RTX 2080 TimeSpy Result Set Leaks - Titan Xp performance
Click here to post a comment for GeForce RTX 2080 TimeSpy Result Set Leaks - Titan Xp performance on our message forum
Rx4speed
When the 1070 came out, wasn't it as fast as the 980ti, and that's been the gauge for many generations, right? So this 2080 is about the same as the 1080ti, .....NOPE, no thanks.
wavetrex
Story twist: It wasn't 2080 but the 2080 Ti 🙄
(Note: I'm joking, memory size and such clearly visible)
On the other hand, the card seems heavily overclocked, and -barely- manages to beat 1080 Ti. Not what I would call impressive...
Barry J
Pretty sure chart shows a stock 1080ti not overclocked
cryohellinc
Or "cough cough" cheap.
Barry J
Time Spy 1.0
Score 10 248
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti(1x) and Intel Core i7-8700K Processor
Graphics Score
10 607
CPU Score
8 601
wavetrex
Just for the reference, a similarly clocked 1080:
https://www.3dmark.com/spy/4298249 - Graphics Score 8141 points
10030 / 8141 = 23%, which is in line with what most realistic estimates from before - This series is between 15 and 25% better than Pascal. That is ALL.
Oh, and this:
https://www.3dmark.com/spy/2520142 - a similarly clocked 1080 Ti ... 10837 points. DUH!
BrainDedd
r411.17 drivers confirmed
mackintosh
Not quite the iterative jump I'd been expecting, especially when compared to the difference between the 980 and the 1080. Disappointing.
Ricepudding
So odd... i'm hoping that this was actually the 2070 or i can't see a consumer reason for this line up. Sure the 2080 is cheaper than the 1080ti, but the performance gains look to be very slim if anything.
any ETA on when reviews our out @hh or it still hush hush?
Going from this and considering its been overclocked the performance jump might be anywhere from 0-8% better, wouldn't say that is worth selling a 1080ti (considering it can also be overclocked like a champ)
Astyanax
If anyones paid attention (not you) they'd know thats not even a mild overclock.
nor is it representative of what a fully unlocked tu104 can do.
Ricepudding
Seems very disappointing to say the least unless the 2080ti has something special hidden in it... we havent seen much about it atm. but 20-25% better does not seem worth it to me, especially with the major cost increase 😏if this was a lot cheaper i could get more behind it
Ricepudding
Didn't linus do a video of you need to basically go down to 720p/1080p to start to see any form of limit? and this is if you happen to have a 240hz monitor.... 1440p+ i assume is fine, we don't reach high enough yet
Edit: [youtube=dt5CNi0aEpI]
Unless you CPU is mid-bottle end, then maybe upgrade that first :P
Ricepudding
be interesting to know if there is any 6 core/8 cores that would also bottleneck at 1440p, also how much of a bottleneck?
Ricepudding
Well considering the 7700k is 4 cores at 4.5ghz, and my 8700k is 6 cores at 4.7ghz (all cores turbo) how much does the bottleneck go due to the extra cores... is there anyone who has tested, now more and more people are getting 6/8 core systems be interesting to know how much of a jump from 4 cores alone that does
Denial
Is the game the bottleneck or Nvidia's driver? Remember Titan V/Turing both utilize non-superscalar execution within the SM and warp threads can now function with independent scheduling - there is a much bigger reliance on thread level parallelism with these architectures than previous.
cowie
going just by the name I think its real but in what form was the system who knows
fantaskarsef
Well, technically the 1080TI's boost clock is also specified as 1582MHz you know?
But we all know that those "max" boost clocks are nothing near daily usage in the average guru's rig.
chispy
If those results are true for a RTX2080 i have just checked my timespy subs and it is slower than a 1080Ti at the same clocks , kind of disappointing with those results. Take it as you will , but i think the RTX2080Ti won't be anything special over a Pascal 1080Ti , add maybe 10% ~25% more performance for ~$500US Dollars more wish maybe it will translate into 10fps gains in todays game lol with no ray tracing 😛. Nothing to write home about ...
Denial
DX12 performance is entirely on the developer. Turing features a number of changes that allows for better thread management but if the developer doesn't focus on the architecture's advancements then it doesn't matter.
I don't know what you're talking about when you say Pascal did notoriously worse in DX11.
MK80
You have full OC??? My pc
Core i7-8700K 4.9Ghz
Score 8479
GtX 1070 1960/8700
Score 6406
