drivers have nothing to do with warzones drop. Not totally true, see below

hrishat:

Lol bro. Are you a console guy? How come you have such a little knowledge about computers. Every game has to be optimized by gpu drivers.

Apparently its you that knows SFA about computers and programming, Direct3D12 doesn't adhere to the concept of driver side optimizations, the only things that can affect performance from a driver in dx12 is either the introduction of a background shader compiler that generations incorrect-for-architecture shader caches, being stuck at a lower performance profile, or correcting the function of a visual effect All of which would be bugs or a fix for one in an earlier driver. There is no performance "drop" bug in the driver, There "was" a bug that resulted in missing or skipped visuals in 442.59 and lower which magically increased FPS. You can see it in this video where a missing post process filter was restored in 442.74 [youtube=OR2_fzT50-g] Even with this bug fix, performance on the ground is more often higher on the new driver than it is with the old. PS: its the heat and wingtrails layer in the deferred renderer, as well as rotors being missing that is broken on 442.59. not rendering something gets you more fps, who'da known. on turings end [youtube=5RfNiteDHZY] again, no fps difference on the ground, unless you count 442.74 hitting higher within the margin of error.

I love it when people go with the "all in our community" line to try and make their argument sound more valid. And then it turns out they're talking about 3 people running Athlon 64's...... Or prone to throttling laptops o_O I'd take you at your word, but I know better, If i can't readily come across it in a google search its obscure in what it affects or doesn't exist at all. Or its exactly what i said it is, broken rendering pass making framerates artificially higher and users with settings higher than they should really be using.