-Tj-:

anyway ROTR looks ok here. 2 runs

Memorian:

You expect a GV104(Performance chipset) to be faster than the High-end GV100 chipset ?

Carfax:

The DX11 renderer on the other hand was smooth as butter and had higher framerates as well.

khanmein:

Are you using Malwarebytes?

dr_rus:

This isn't saying much. Did you compare 770 to 811? .43 to .59? And did you use something like 1080p?

Carfax:

Anyway, I didn't get any of the weird frametime spikes you were getting, with max settings and SMAA.

dr_rus:

2 runs of what? This isn't even one run of the benchmark there. You also have a different card. I expect GA104 gaming oriented mid high end GPU to be slightly faster in gaming than a previous gen compute oriented GV100 GPU, yes. This isn't saying much. Did you compare 770 to 811? .43 to .59? And did you use something like 1080p? No. There is no additional CPU load. Downgrading ROTTR to b770 solves the issue of frametimes but it doesn't completely solve the issue of lower performance in low resolution which is likely a driver issue. I'll downgrade to .43 today and check if this will bring back the performance.

dr_rus:

Frametime variance is certainly on the game's latest patch. Here, I've compared it between b770 and b811: https://abload.de/img/2017-12-0910_16_34-yaspv.png 770 https://abload.de/img/2017-12-0910_10_04-beueskp.png 811 Loss of performance in 1080p isn't though as even b770 is slower on .59 than on .31. Off to downgrading the driver now... Update: downgraded back to 388.31 and am getting essentially the same result in Far Cry Primal in 1080p as on .59 - and nowhere near what I was getting back when .31 released. So it's not the driver and it's most likely the latest Win10 1709 update. Will do a clean install of 1709 b16299.98 in an hour and see if this will change anything. FFS, MS... This will be a third clean install of 1709 because of various problems it brought.

bishi:

Try running the game with Full Screen Optimisations disabled

Keesberenburg:

I want to see some game benchmarks with the Titan V Why GF drivers if it is a AI card. Better AI in games?

cookieboyeli:

Run driver store explorer and delete old drivers: https://driverstoreexplorer.codeplex.com/ Run DDU and delete the driver installed, then extract the exe of the installer for the driver you want to install, make a .txt file with this in it rd /s /q Display.Optimus rd /s /q Display.NView rd /s /q Display.Update rd /s /q GFExperience rd /s /q GFExperience.NvStreamSrv rd /s /q GfExperienceService rd /s /q HDAudio rd /s /q LEDVisualizer rd /s /q Miracast.VirtualAudio rd /s /q MS.NET rd /s /q MSVCRT rd /s /q Network.Service rd /s /q nodejs rd /s /q NV3DVision rd /s /q NV3DVisionUSB.Driver rd /s /q NvBackend rd /s /q NvCamera rd /s /q NvContainer rd /s /q NvTelemetry rd /s /q NVWMI rd /s /q NvVAD rd /s /q NvvHCI rd /s /q PhysX rd /s /q ShadowPlay rd /s /q ShieldWirelessController rd /s /q Update.Core change the extension to .bat, stick it in the folder where you extracted the driver, run it, - it will delete 800MB of garbage from the installer then install the driver with the setup.exe. (Essentially just delete all folders except NV12 and Display.Driver) Bringing it down from something like 1.2GB extracted to around 400MB, if compressed with 7zip it's 300MB exactly. You can also replace the old 1.0.61 Vulkan runtime in the Display.Driver folder with 1.0.65.1 released today which you can find in the Vulkan API here: LunarXchange Now you're left with pure Nvidia drivers and only the Control panel. If you want to save a couple gigs more space download Image health https://toolslib.net/downloads/viewdownload/248-image-health/ and run the extended garbage cleanup it will take a long time but your WinSxS folder will go back down below 7GB from whatever it's at. (Can grow over 20Gb...)

kilyan:

bad drivers for ac origins,stuttering mess. back to 388.43 and fine again

squalles:

i can just remove all these paths except physx and install the driver normally? i want only install driver, physx and vulkan api

Dragondale13:

You only need to keep : Display folder NVI2 folder Physx folder Vulkan driver is inside display folder, it gets installed silently. Don't have AC Origins but these seem the same as 388.43 in the games I play. I have my suspicions about the latest MS update bogging down system performance though. The gpu score in FireStrike is the same since Creators Update, but since this Fall Creators update, CPU performance has dropped a tad. 3930k C2 HT on at 4.5ghz Clean install of the OS would be next logical step but I just don't have the time, so "process of elimination" is currently ongoing lol! 🙂

dr_rus:

Well, I've restored the system completely and performance is the same as it was on .31 now. Weird. No idea why it was suddenly lower in low resolutions.

squalles:

NVI2 folder have files called nvidianetwork and etc... its really necessary? look anything like online check

dr_rus:

Well, I've restored the system completely and performance is the same as it was on .31 now. Weird. No idea why it was suddenly lower in low resolutions.

Dragondale13:

Yes it's necessary.It doesn't install anything dealing with telemetry.Those files are needed for the installer to work.It'll check online only for the ad splash screens that the nv installer uses.If you disconnect from the net and install the driver, the splash screens remain blank with no ads from Nvidia.

X7007:

How to disable the NVidia Tray icon in the new drivers?/? Also does Nvidia has anything to do with UXDService while trying to restart or shutdown computer ? saying the service need to be close etc etc.

X7007:

How to disable the NVidia Tray icon in the new drivers?