Far Cry 5 PC graphics performance benchmark review

Game reviews 127 Page 1 of 1 Published by

Click here to post a comment for Far Cry 5 PC graphics performance benchmark review on our message forum
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/258/258664.jpg
Still I have to find any major detail improvement with ultra over low on those screenshots... I guess it will only be lighting and voluminetric stuff?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/16/16662.jpg
Administrator
fantaskarsef:

Still I have to find any major detail improvement with ultra over low on those screenshots... I guess it will only be lighting and voluminetric stuff?
Background mountains, vegetation, shadows, but also things like water shows that really well. I'll try and see if I can update the screenshots today with a better batch (environment) showing the differences.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/272/272918.jpg
looking forward to this, glad it seems to be optimised well on day 1
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/175/175902.jpg
Have you noticed that the AMD Fury line perform quite good, despite they were performing not so good at launch. Fun isn't it?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/261/261368.jpg
There is no way to disable Rapid Packed Math? I would like to see how much it improves over normal.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/258/258664.jpg
Hilbert Hagedoorn:

Background mountains, vegetation, shadows, but also things like water shows that really well. I'll try and see if I can update the screenshots today with a better batch (environment) showing the differences.
Oh you are right, I just looked at the water now and it does look better. Thanks for pointing it out but you already did a good job in all the testing, probably soon you can find comparison screenshots for all the settings on the net too if one (I) wants to check.
data/avatar/default/avatar08.webp
Nice The Exclusieve Vega features works great, but only a big gap on 1440P
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/261/261368.jpg
Ubisoft should team up with Amd more often.. Their gamework implementations are often bad. I just playd FC4 and I had to disable all gameworks effects to make it not crash every 30mins.
data/avatar/default/avatar13.webp
Yet another AMD sponsored title that runs SMOOTH on everything and is not gimping anyone with gimpworks, and looks great while doing that on DAY ONE.
data/avatar/default/avatar17.webp
Perjantai:

Ubisoft should team up with Amd more often.. Their gamework implementations are often bad. I just playd FC4 and I had to disable all gameworks effects to make it not crash every 30mins.
This game have also Nvidia turf effect for vegetation 😉
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/248/248994.jpg
Ubisoft: "You have already gamed quite enough today, friend. For the sake of your health, let's wait 24 hours before continuing, mmkay?" That was the reason, right?
data/avatar/default/avatar17.webp
HDR pops out if you turn Windows HDR on?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/113/113386.jpg
Wow the performance is unreal, thank you ubisoft!!!! Can't believe the Fury X is still that good, i made a good purchase afterall. 😀
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/235/235224.jpg
Ultra settings still looks like a ps4 game :/ Might be different when I'm playing it but it looks like a step backwards from GR:Wildlands. Performance looks good, thanks for the review HH.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/209/209146.jpg
Spets:

Ultra settings still looks like a ps4 game :/ Might be different when I'm playing it but it looks like a step backwards from GR:Wildlands. Performance looks good, thanks for the review HH.
Different engine, Dunia compared to Anvil which you then have Anvil Next in Wildlands compared to the new version in Origins and it looks pretty dated digging into the engine internals although Origins lacks the additional graphical effects offered by GameWorks for users who have enough GPU power to enable these. 🙂 They did a pretty thorough overhaul for Far Cry 4 though and then a smaller one for Primal and now here's Far Cry 5 with physically accurate materials and a fancy water system though I assume pop-in for vegetation and LOD might still be a thing, unsure how the shadow system is though it appears to be a variant on PCSS for smooth shadows and filtering if that info was accurate.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/254/254725.jpg
Strange to see 4C/4T doing a little better than 4C/8T.
data/avatar/default/avatar34.webp
Strange seeing a GTX 1080Ti is recommended to play at 3840x2160 when based on the results a GTX 1080 seems sufficient.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/16/16662.jpg
Administrator
For those interested, I have just added some Ryzen CPU results.
data/avatar/default/avatar13.webp
Do you need a CPU that has SSE4.1 or 4.2 or whatever old CPU's lack? Have a Phenom 965BE running around 4.0GHZ and no issues on most games.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/16/16662.jpg
Administrator
fantaskarsef:

Oh you are right, I just looked at the water now and it does look better. Thanks for pointing it out but you already did a good job in all the testing, probably soon you can find comparison screenshots for all the settings on the net too if one (I) wants to check.
I have added another set of screenshots, showcasing image quality, all downloadable in uncompressed quality.