F1 2020: PC graphics performance benchmark performance analysis with 30 GPUs (DLSS update)

Published by

Click here to post a comment for F1 2020: PC graphics performance benchmark performance analysis with 30 GPUs (DLSS update) on our message forum
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/253/253070.jpg
This was a neat thing to read. But am I assuming correctly that Vsync is enabled by default in the game title and can't disable it in game config? It just stood out to me you had to disable Vsync by configuring an ini file
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/16/16662.jpg
Administrator
Angantyr:

This was a neat thing to read. But am I assuming correctly that Vsync is enabled by default in the game title and can't disable it in game config? It just stood out to me you had to disable Vsync by configuring an ini file
I had rewritten that bit, no you just configure it in-game. No worries.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/250/250667.jpg
1080Ti still rocking
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/220/220214.jpg
Sound of the car in that video is terrible. Maybe that's what real F1 cars sound like these days. Close your eyes and it sounds like some pizza courier riding a Honda 50 motorcycle. F1 sound is a pale shadow of its former glory. I got the Ferrari F2004 V10 in the "Assetto Corsa - Ferrari Pack" DLC and the sound is absolutely glorious - the way F1 used to sound.
data/avatar/default/avatar32.webp
atrocious performance on AMD cards They just not talking to developers.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/252/252141.jpg
Ah man, I need to upgrade my GTX 1050 Ti already...!
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
Martin5000:

atrocious performance on AMD cards They just not talking to developers.
2060s and 2070s are not faster than 5700 and 5700xt if not they are tad slower. Considering amd cards are cheaper how can you call that atrocious?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/79/79740.jpg
Undying:

2060s and 2070s are not faster than 5700 and 5700xt if not they are tad slower. Considering amd cards are cheaper how can you call that atrocious?
Actually the 2070s is faster than the 5700xt in the majority of games. However if you only look at games like BF 5 where the 5700xt is clearly faster, and not bother to look at anything else, I can see how you come to that conclusion. https://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/amd-radeon-rx-5700-and-5700-xt-review,13.html https://www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-radeon-rx-5700-xt/28.html https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-radeon-rx_5700-rx_5700_xt,6216-2.html
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/273/273678.jpg
is AMD going to blame the use of Nvidia features again? well, with robert hallock involved, probably.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
alanm:

Actually the 2070s is faster than the 5700xt in the majority of games. However if you only look at games like BF 5 where the 5700xt is clearly faster, and not bother to look at anything else, I can see how you come to that conclusion. https://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/amd-radeon-rx-5700-and-5700-xt-review,13.html https://www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-radeon-rx-5700-xt/28.html https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-radeon-rx_5700-rx_5700_xt,6216-2.html
5700xt is ahead of 2070super in metro and tomb raider both dx12 games in that guru3d review. Nvidia is faster in every dx11 title.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/79/79740.jpg
Undying:

5700xt is ahead of 2070super in metro and tomb raider both dx12 games in that guru3d review. Nvidia is faster in every dx11 title.
Not in tomb raider, look again.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/273/273678.jpg
Undying:

5700xt is ahead of 2070super in metro and tomb raider both dx12 games in that guru3d review. Nvidia is faster in every dx11 title.
Until you turn RTX off, then the 2070 super spanks the 5700XT, which the guru3d exactly demonstrates
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/196/196426.jpg
HARDRESET:

1080Ti still rocking
1080 non-Ti still rocking at slightly lower resolution 2018-2019-generation GPUs are so lame... Can't wait to get past that with this year's releases !
data/avatar/default/avatar31.webp
S V S:

I can't even remember buying my 1080 Ti, it has been so long. I still feel very little reason to upgrade because I run a high FPS 1440P monitor, versus 4K. People here give Nvidia a lot of crap but IMO, Nvidia has put out a lot of long-lasting performance parts and it isn't fair to just ignore that fact (recent history: 680, 780 and 1080 Tis). AMD doesn't have many GPUs that remain high-performance for several years.
Apart the rx480 and rx580? They have been strong for long.
data/avatar/default/avatar33.webp
Astyanax:

Until you turn RTX off, then the 2070 super spanks the 5700XT, which the guru3d exactly demonstrates
Still the 2070 super is starting at 560 on amazon and the 5700xt is starting at 399. You can compare 2 cards if there is a 40% difference in price. ( 5700XT + 40% price = 2070 super )
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/273/273678.jpg
asturur:

Still the 2070 super is starting at 560 on amazon and the 5700xt is starting at 399.
you buy a 2070 super, you don't get black screens and broken video decoding.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/236/236506.jpg
asturur:

Still the 2070 super is starting at 560 on amazon and the 5700xt is starting at 399. You can compare 2 cards if there is a 40% difference in price. ( 5700XT + 40% price = 2070 super )
I just checked on Amazon UK, there you can get a Red Dragon, one of the best 5700XTs, for £390, a Gaming X 2070 Super is £520. They are a different price tier. Under 400 quid for such a great card is good value.
data/avatar/default/avatar05.webp
Astyanax:

you buy a 2070 super, you don't get black screens and broken video decoding.
But don't be surprised if the more expensive one is a tad faster in a bunch of games. It should be normal.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/150/150085.jpg
At 1440p the 2060s beats the 2070. LOL
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/268/268248.jpg
S V S:

I can't even remember buying my 1080 Ti, it has been so long. I still feel very little reason to upgrade because I run a high FPS 1440P monitor, versus 4K. People here give Nvidia a lot of crap but IMO, Nvidia has put out a lot of long-lasting performance parts and it isn't fair to just ignore that fact (recent history: 680, 780 and 1080 Tis). AMD doesn't have many GPUs that remain high-performance for several years.
what about the r9 290 and 290x 7970 & 7970 ghz rx 480 and rx 470 ? especially the 290 just does not want to die the 7970 was direct competitor to the 680 and over time the 7970 aged much better , 290x was competitor to 780ti witch also the 290x aged better