Dual GPU AMD Radeon R9 Fury X2 In Circulation ?

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Dual GPU AMD Radeon R9 Fury X2 In Circulation ? on our message forum
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
Is that a known dodgy website? I mean techpowerup, guru3d and other trusted sites would be much better proof. ,
I know but HH does not have the time to do all this single/multi GPU game benchmarks over and over. He dont even have that much GPU's/CPU's to test. Its still better than that Polish pclab hokum-pokum site.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/34/34585.jpg
http://www.*******.com/ubisoft-looking-assassins-creed-syndicate-sli-issues/ Seems even with the latest patch the game is broken with SLi, funny how crossfire is working flawlessly LMFAO! first for everything really, even funnier for being a "the way it's meant to be played" title. I had to look cause the nVidia cards got like 5% boost with SLi which is pretty low so did some digging and the game is broken on SLi.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/226/226864.jpg
technicaly yes i agree (on the same way that the AMD gpu are really great and inovative (HBM))... but they are more dependent from their driver, and those driver are ... not so great 🙂 . this is why in general SLI is more usable, with lot less issue (quote that i haven't said "none") driver and the ability to define SLI profile where there is not. as on track, an archaic 80's race car with no electronic can fly around an brand new audi with top engine... it's always due to Driver 😉 the drivers is for sure the cause of the 5 point in favor of NVidia in the sale of GPU
Currently it seems Nvidia has at least as much if not more trouble getting games to work with SLI in their drivers than AMD with CrossfireX and theirs. Nvidia has become much worse in the driver department this past year and AMD has improved somwhat. I'd say that right now, AMD's and Nvidia's drivers are pretty much on par. Some work better with some games, others with others. One also has to consider that there've als been lots of bad console ports lately where neither SLi nor CrossfireX works.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/235/235224.jpg
Are we seriously going to sit here and cherry pick benchmarks again?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/258/258801.jpg
Seeing as crossfire/SLI support is getting dropped like flies I doubt its going to be much of a hit. Not event talking about how 375W max is going to throttle this card to hell and back considering 1 Fury X already sucks up 250W.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
I never, ever got FPS even close to what those benchmarks show from that website. They are always, always, horribly off.
You never get close to 48fps with your "HD 7990" on V.High? If so then something is wrong with your system man.
data/avatar/default/avatar23.webp
You never get close to 48fps with your "HD 7990" on V.High? If so then something is wrong with your system man.
You misunderstood. Coming close does not exclusively mean coming close from below. I get framerates MUCH higher than what benchmarks from GameGPU show. They never were accurate for any game I have seen so far.
data/avatar/default/avatar32.webp
Seeing as crossfire/SLI support is getting dropped like flies I doubt its going to be much of a hit. Not event talking about how 375W max is going to throttle this card to hell and back considering 1 Fury X already sucks up 250W.
Nano is what, 190W? Two of these here.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/258/258664.jpg
Hmmm. 2x Fury with 375W. Single Fury 250W power draw. I guess the clocks will be pretty throttled.
Sorry, but will have to quote myself from the start of t his thread again, see above. I only wonder why they didn't think about giving this a dual gpu closed loop solution, might be interesting to develop, could increase people's interest in such a card late in the game. Could be interesting for nvidia too, but they are more interested in you buying two cards for SLI.