I have this monitor for entertainment cause i want more widescreen effect with gaming and movies and i dont want go back to 16:9 vertical resolution is no problem for normal use. Edit I meen i have the EA93 http://i43.tinypic.com/2jady88.jpg

I have no problems with the reaction time and input lag with the ea93. And it is true 21:9 cause movies let show the 2.35.1 (21:9)

I use the Dell UltraSharp U2913WM for gaming etc. Really like the extra width, but I would have prefered it to be a bit larger than 29", since the height of the display is considerable smaller then what it is on my 27" 16:9 LG. Only issue I found is when watching Netflix, they don't support 21:9. @NAMEk Input lag is fine for general gaming, Iv'e even seen som of the professional StarCraft II players prefering IPS panels. I mainly use mine for mmo's and racing games, but I do play a few fps titles too, like FarCry 3, ShootMania etc., and really don't feel like their is any input-lag going on, but I had to use some time to setup the monitor, like using the correct profiles, using v-sync on my games etc. You can notice that a 120Hz is faster, but if you don't play fps on pro level and prefer extra width, better colors and black levels, then you will enjoy these newer IPS panels a lot more than a 120Hz. Oh, and I can recommend any one with a newer mobo that has a LucidLogic onboard chip to invest in the MVP software, it really gives a nice steady picture in games with their v-syn option on IPS panels.

I have no problems with the reaction time and input lag with the ea93. And it is true 21:9 cause movies let show the 2.35.1 (21:9)

21x9 is actually 2.33:1 aspect ratio (divide 21 by 9) 16x9 is 1.78:1 There are no hard and fast rules for what a cinematographer/director will decide to do with aspect ratios. Movie can be between 1.3 (Old/rare) and even the ultra rare and wide 4.0 - but the happy medium is 2.75. Django unchained had 2.35:1 'A Good Day to Die Hard' had 1.85:1 (practically 16x9)

So whats the difference between this and there "other" model? LG29EB93-P I want to get one of these sometime this coming winter.. But it will be between asus and LG..

Yet another *yawn* I'll bite, gladly even, once they come with 21:9 screens with 1200, 1440, 1600 or higher vertical res. 1080 ? Next please.

Yet another *yawn* I'll bite, gladly even, once they come with 21:9 screens with 1200, 1440, 1600 or higher vertical res. 1080 ? Next please.

They do it so you can use it with just 1 high end video card.. 1200 and higher your pretty much having to have 2 video cards so you can play at those said resolutions. Im 90% sure you will see 1200 and prolly 1440 by early 2015.

I have 37" Samsung dv6500, for movies it's not bad, i expected better, but for gaming - impossible to play. I think whole lag between controller and TV is > 120ms .

Yikes!

Ghar. I'm honestly tired of these wider screens. I really miss 16:10 and having the vertical reading space. It just suits a desktop environment better. 16:9 isn't terrible and that's what my second display is but it looks goofy next to a 16:10. I honestly don't think I'd purchase something wider than 16:9 for a desktop monitor. I guess if it's your TV sure but I need desktop space.