Debunking Lunar Landing Conspiracies with Maxwell and VXGI

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Debunking Lunar Landing Conspiracies with Maxwell and VXGI on our message forum
#4919487
data/avatar/default/avatar15.webp
If the "Soon to land" object would be the size of a small planet then yes, a part of it would manage to "land" before being vaporized.
That would depend on what it's made of, capt. obv reporting
#4919498
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/211/211933.jpg
That would depend on what it's made of, capt. obv reporting
gtx titans of course, capt. oblivious.
#4919505
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/235/235344.jpg
Tin Foil Hat off... Is everyone nuts? Capricorn One was a documentary on the lunar landing cover up but had to substitute a Mars mission so the producers of the film wouldn't end up like Dustin Hoffman in Wag The Dog. Tin Foil Hat back on...
#4919519
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/56/56686.jpg
i don't believe we went to the moon, and never will. IF we did why we not have bigger presence on it seeing it has all that helium 3
#4919534
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/80/80129.jpg
i don't believe we went to the moon, and never will. IF we did why we not have bigger presence on it seeing it has all that helium 3
Economics. I honestly can't tell who is being serious and who isn't. Is this real life?
#4919539
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/142/142454.jpg
i don't believe we went to the moon, and never will. IF we did why we not have bigger presence on it seeing it has all that helium 3
If you truly believed that, I say this with the maximum respect possible, you are a fool. This is also probably why you can't understand the obvious answer to your question which is that it isn't cost effective. It costs millions to just reach The Moon with any kind of robotic probe. It costs billions if you want to put a man on The Moon. The cost of some kind of Helium-3 mining operation is beyond what any nation is capable of, that's science fiction at this point.
#4919567
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/235/235344.jpg
Capricorn One is as much of a documentary as Transformers is.
You're not serious are you? You mean Michael Bay used some kind of new fangled Hollywood Tom Foolery. Dang nabbit, that just cannot be. All my dreams and aspirations to one day come face to face or just find evidence of an actual Transformer has now been shot to He|| in a hand basket. Thanks a lot. Out of disgust hastily grabs tinfoil hat, crumples it up and lets it fall where it may.
#4919572
data/avatar/default/avatar10.webp
It pretty much depends on definition of "landing" and with right definition, you can land even during day.
Ok what factor skin protection do I need. also I think its mainly made of gas so could you land on my farts.
#4919574
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/235/235344.jpg
Ok what factor skin protection do I need. also I think its mainly made of gas so could you land on my farts.
Been stated in racist, and hair color jokes...It can only be accomplished at night.
#4919584
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/235/235344.jpg
All manned landings happened during the lunar daytime. Thus, the stars were outshone by the sun and by sunlight reflected off the Moon's surface. The astronauts' eyes were adapted to the sunlit landscape around them so that they could not see the relatively faint stars. Likewise, cameras were set for daylight exposure and could not detect the stars. Camera settings can turn a well-lit background to black when the foreground object is brightly lit, forcing the camera to increase shutter speed so that the foreground light does not wash-out the image. A demonstration of this effect is here. The effect is similar to not being able to see stars from a brightly lit car park at night—the stars only become visible when the lights are turned off. The astronauts could see stars with the naked eye only when they were in the shadow of the Moon. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :book: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Seeing is not believing......
You saying that because the light was on they were not actually there and that by extinguishing the sun they magically appeared on the lunar surface? Calling Harry Houdini to the witness stand...
#4919590
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242471.jpg
Only possible on maxwell - new "most powerful" gpu.. Marketing at its finest! Wonder how much nvidia payed them to say that :P
#4919598
data/avatar/default/avatar17.webp
And what time zone do I use on the moon.
#4919603
data/avatar/default/avatar35.webp
As my sundial is all over the place.
#4919635
data/avatar/default/avatar13.webp
Ok google how did we land on the moon there is no spoon
#4919655
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/191/191875.jpg
The astronauts could see stars with the naked eye only when they were in the shadow of the Moon.
How exactly do you get in the shadow of the moon while you're on the moon? Lol I get what you're saying but clearly the mistake here is that you tried to use facts when in fact the thread wandered off in to the region of talk utter b*llocks around a page and a half ago.
The moon is made of cheese, Swiss to be precise, that's my theory am I wrong??? You haven't been there prove me wrong..
I can't say I have been to the Mun but I know someone who has and he seems to disagree with your Swiss cheese theory. http://i878.photobucket.com/albums/ab347/laughingman09/KSP_x642014-09-2222-09-08-56_zps76bd3d08.jpg
#4919674
data/avatar/default/avatar15.webp
Do you disagree because of the holes in the evidence.
#4919824
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/191/191875.jpg
Do you disagree because of the holes in the evidence.
HA I see what you did there!
Did not know that Kerbal's were in search of cheese on the moon.
95% of the time it's not the Mun, depends on what direction the rocket goes after the first three stages explode.

Previous Page

Next Page