Corona CPU Benchmark Download v1.3

Generic Benchmarks 55 Updated by Hilbert Hagedoorn

Click here to post a comment for Corona CPU Benchmark Download on our message forum
#5242645
data/avatar/default/avatar40.webp
could not run corona 1.3. Your processor doesnt support required features (SSE 4.1) in a phenom x6 1090 t
#5242832
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/249/249269.jpg
Corona 1.3 Benchmark Corona 1.3 Benchmark Finished BTR Scene 16 passes Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4930K CPU @ 3.40GHz Real CPU Frequency [GHz]: 4.5 Render Time: 0:02:49, Rays/sec: 2 859 090
#5243751
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/201/201426.jpg
Stock I7 - 4930K (3.9ghz) 16GB DDR3@2400mhz Corona 1.3 Benchmark Finished BTR Scene 16 passes Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4930K CPU @ 3.40GHz Real CPU Frequency [GHz]: 3.9 Render Time: 0:03:08, Rays/sec: 2 579 900
You beat me by 9 seconds. I got 0:03:17 with my 3930k @ 4.1. With my other X79 I could 4.8, but this Asus is a b*tch to get over 4.1 doing a 126 base clock. It literally will not post if I just do a voltage bump, 100 base, and X46 or X48 multi like my MSI X79. I really wanna see how I do @ 4.6. I need to test my i7 3820 @ 4 ghz with this.
#5243903
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/191/191689.jpg
I clicked the link in your OP. EDIT: I downloaded and ran the version from the link you provided above, same result. I see the application makes (or attempts to make) an encrypted TCP connection to corona-renderer.com (31.31.73.99).
#5243913
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/90/90026.jpg
Corona 1.3 Benchmark Finished BTR Scene 16 passes Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-5775C CPU @ 3.30GHz Real CPU Frequency [GHz]: Undetected Render Time: 0:03:55, Rays/sec: 2*062*850 TBH cpu is at @4ghz and ram 2133 cl 9
#5243916
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242471.jpg
Corona 1.3 Benchmark Finished BTR Scene 16 passes Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-5775C CPU @ 3.30GHz Real CPU Frequency [GHz]: Undetected Render Time: 0:03:55, Rays/sec: 2*062*850 TBH cpu is at @4ghz and ram 2133 cl 9
You're the first one I saw with that cpu. 🤓 How is it OC'ing, like by reviews ~4.2 - 4.3ghz or you haven't tested more then 4ghz?
#5244110
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/90/90026.jpg
You're the first one I saw with that cpu. 🤓 How is it OC'ing, like by reviews ~4.2 - 4.3ghz or you haven't tested more then 4ghz?
Tried 4.1, worked. But 4.0 is enough for my needs. Besides...I had problem to achieve that 4ghz anyway, or even all cores 3.7 because 1 option in uefi. I figured out it finally, but OC was pain in ass. Dumb throttling every try. I got it delided BTW, and used coolabolatory ultra. But my cooler is rather crappy so I little affraid to OC more, as it require more V both on cores and on ring(cache). Cache is another story, cannot set it up more than 3.4ghz, more results in freezes while gaming(mostly my son games in CS:GO), ofc pushing V should help, but then temps rises too much for me to feel comfortable with it. One guy from my country(of origin) had problems too, he finnaly found stable 4.13Ghz at 1.3V core or 4.2Ghz with 1.4v, and ring 1.3 at 3,4ghz...witch is killing this cpu. He sold it anyway, and went to skylake. I am using 1.234V atm and it is good, ring is on 3,4 as said and 1,2v. As looking on web games test this cpu on this speed is faster than HW 4.5ghz, so no need to push it more. End of OT 🙂
#5244303
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/252/252347.jpg
lol they guys in first place have dual XEON E5-2686 V3 (thats 36 cores for both) Retail around $3,650.00 each or 950 each for Engineering sample's Speedys cpus by themselves cost over 7k new....god only knows how much the hole pc cost to make? cpus alone cost more than my truck did. People like that have special insurance just for there pc?:)
#5244678
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/229/229509.jpg
W3680 @ 4GHz: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU W3680 @ 3.33GHz Time: 0:03:38, Rays/sec: 2,230,730
#5246277
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/226/226552.jpg
It's crazy how well optimised this is for hyper threading. My 4690K @ 4.5 GHz got 1,421,760 My Q9650 @ 4.0 Ghz got 934,828 But my i7 870 @ 4.0 GHz got a whopping 1,564,660!! The i7 870 can sometimes out perform the 4690k when the i7 is overclocked and the i5 is at stock but never when they are both overclocked. I've also never seen a Nehalem outperform a Core 2 Quad buy such a wide margin before, this is mad: http://i1115.photobucket.com/albums/k554/James_Michael_McGrath/Untitled_zpswqh8yxqb.jpg

Next Page