Core i9-9900K and i7-9700K turbo clocks revealed - 4.7 GHz with all eight cores

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Core i9-9900K and i7-9700K turbo clocks revealed - 4.7 GHz with all eight cores on our message forum
#5572907
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/196/196426.jpg
Fake. We'll be lucky if it does 4.0 all cores, and that with some beefy cooling, and not in SSE jobs, which will throttle to 3.8 or something. Magic doesn't happen overnight; changing a number from 7 to 9 is insufficient. Needs more Faery dust for that.
#5572909
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/274/274789.jpg
yeah another fake tdp from intel
#5572916
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/263/263841.jpg
Still can't believe that an i7-k processor doesn't have hyperthreading.
#5572919
data/avatar/default/avatar27.webp
Yogi:

Still can't believe that an i7-k processor doesn't have hyperthreading.
It is too good to be called a i5, but it is not good enough to be called a i9, so it cant really be named anything else then i7. I would guess it would be faster then a i7 8700k and i7 7820x, if it is able to run at the clocks described here, so it is really closer to the i9 labeling then i5.
#5572920
data/avatar/default/avatar29.webp
moeppel:

That's not going to be 95W
TDP has always been specified for running at base clocks only. Turbos are not guaranteed if your board and cooling cannot sustain them. So yeah, it'll use more then 95W if your cooling and power delivery can keep up with that. But all CPUs always have. Ryzen will also exceed the 95W rating.
#5572922
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/246/246171.jpg
*sigh* People here really need to remember that the TDP rating is based on base clocks. Intel isn't claiming 95W at 4.7Ghz, that's absurd. Also, since these are supposed to use real TIM for the IHS, 4.7GHz on all cores with a modest air cooler should be achievable. I avoid Intel wherever justifiable, but damn, some of you people are so caught up in hating them that you don't realize how ridiculous you sound.
#5572924
data/avatar/default/avatar27.webp
schmidtbag:

*sigh* People here really need to remember that the TDP rating is based on base clocks. Intel isn't claiming 95W at 4.7Ghz, that's absurd. Also, since these are supposed to use real TIM for the IHS, 4.7GHz on all cores with a modest air cooler should be achievable. I avoid Intel wherever justifiable, but damn, some of you people are so caught up in hating them that you don't realize how ridiculous you sound.
Well that's guru3d forums anno 2018... Nice to see competition doing wonders for us who love hardware 😀
#5572926
data/avatar/default/avatar35.webp
Strange Times:

yeah another fake tdp from intel
Yet another epic fail post....
#5572943
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/270/270008.jpg
schmidtbag:

*sigh* People here really need to remember that the TDP rating is based on base clocks. Intel isn't claiming 95W at 4.7Ghz, that's absurd. Also, since these are supposed to use real TIM for the IHS, 4.7GHz on all cores with a modest air cooler should be achievable. I avoid Intel wherever justifiable, but damn, some of you people are so caught up in hating them that you don't realize how ridiculous you sound.
You have a point but Intel is also being misleading in regards to TDP's. The entire point of TDP's was so that vendors could determine proper cooling solutions. When you are selling products that boost clocks, you at min should publish the all core boost TDP since that is something that will occur when simply using the CPU as intended. You will certainly need a better cooling solution than dissipating 95W. I think these are going to be damn good CPU's by the way. No Intel hate here.
#5572950
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/268/268248.jpg
if they keep their current "stock" cooler those turbos will be just a distant dream that said i guess thats why they sholder so they can push their cpus close to their limit leaving only 300-500 mhz headroom for oc like ryzen
#5572952
data/avatar/default/avatar29.webp
There's room for both I dont hate either camp.Just remember intel has been top-dog for so long now and finally Amd stepping it up might of throw them off there game for a little bit but they will be just fine I think. Both companys need each other and bring out the best in one another I think. I started a new build based on Ryzen iam proud to say but I would never turn down team blue if I had the xtra $$$.
#5572954
data/avatar/default/avatar23.webp
Witcher29:

Bye bye overheated ryzen cpu,s. with full of hardware related problems.
lol what? i havent seen a single ryzen chip going above 85c even overclocked. meanwhile intel consistently going 90-100c
#5572956
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242471.jpg
I have to admit it's tempting, all 8cores @4.7GHz. I wanted such cpu back in 2013, but all I had to offer was a 1000$ cpu in 2014 lol.. At least this 8 threaded is better then a regular 4core/thread cpu, I knew it would get handy now since 2016+. That said, I will pass, want something even more advanced, looking at you IceLake, but this shit keeps on stalling since 2016 and another 2 years to go..
#5572970
data/avatar/default/avatar34.webp
Well... This got me thinking, latest x299 used TIM. Is the Xeon line also using it? Back on track... Could that be the difference between solder and TIM on Intel CPU? Delidding appears to have some effect, so... It should help dissipate all that heat. Then again, none of the K series come with coolers, so it's up to you buying the most adequate kit. Perhaps a monstrous industrial chiller?
#5572974
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242134.jpg
@Tj TR?
#5572988
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/223/223196.jpg
Right now a new system with 9900K and dual NVlinked GXT1180/2080 sounds mighty tempting...
#5573012
data/avatar/default/avatar36.webp
So the i78700k being 6/12 will be maybe better than the 9700k that is 8/8?
#5573013
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/123/123760.jpg
-Tj-:

I have to admit it's tempting, all 8cores @4.7GHz. I wanted such cpu back in 2013, but all I had to offer was a 1000$ cpu in 2014 lol.. At least this 8 threaded is better then a regular 4core/thread cpu, I knew it would get handy now since 2016+. That said, I will pass, want something even more advanced, looking at you IceLake, but this crap keeps on stalling since 2016 and another 2 years to go..
Might get one. 5820K lacks control over AVX workload in the BIOS and it's imo hampering my ability to overclock it further. I have to literally ditch AVX if I want to push it further. That and I'm not that satisfied with the singl core performance.
#5573021
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/216/216349.jpg
Those chips look nice but having to buy a new MB to use them makes a very hard case for them, at least for me. Although sometimes i think if i should make a new build around these because they are probably the last CPUs from Intel to work properly on W7, that i want to keep as long as possible...

Next Page