Core i9 11900KF Sample Hits 98 Degrees C cooled with 360mm AIO Under Load
Click here to post a comment for Core i9 11900KF Sample Hits 98 Degrees C cooled with 360mm AIO Under Load on our message forum
IceVip
nah, i need 1.25v for 99+
cucaulay malkin
11900KFC 😀
https://i.imgur.com/whpTyJu.jpeg
BLEH!
This is getting ridiculous now. Hell, even my 22 nm 5960X runs at 4 GHz on an NH-D14 at under 80 C on full load!
Silva
I know its Intel, but I'll wait for reviews before judging.
Jagman
BAH! That's nothing Intel, my kettle does 100 C @240V (liquid cooled of course)
Beat that!
schmidtbag
Actually Ryzen 5000 does support AVX2[56]. It doesn't support 512 though.
But yes, AVX2 does really crank up the heat. I haven't really seen anything related to temperatures with 512 but logic dictates it would run hotter. So, I think these temperature results are realistic given the test, but we shouldn't pass judgment on the CPU over a synthetic worst-case scenario.
Freeman
Very disappointing, not much to look forward to if it turns out to be true.
Same chip as previous with higher clock and higher temp.
nizzen
The knowledge is real 😀
Venix
While it will most likely run hot this leak with kind of voltage is not something that reveals anything really.
Falkentyne
Yeah there was.
Some guy with a crappy AIO hitting super high temps at 4.8 ghz or something.
I had an ES chip and pre-release board from Asus, and I ran the same test with an Arctic Liquid Freezer II 360 and Thermalright TFX paste and it was in the 70C range in AIDA64 "Stress FPU".
So that guy with his ES in China clearly did something very, very wrong.
Also there's no way a RKL is going to require 1.41v at 4.8 ghz. We've done this rodeo before...
*Edit*.
Doesn't RKL support AVX 512?
If AIDA64 is testing AVX512, no wonder it's running hot. AVX512 completely destroys HEDT chips, that's why such a large offset is used.
Neo Cyrus
A nice downgrade to 8 cores, despite implying 10 by the name, and people will still line up to suck off Intel for a chance to buy it at some outrageous inflated price.
Undying
But its faster than amd in 1080p. Thats all that matters.
Neo Cyrus
I'm not sure if you're being sarcastic or not. Value for the money; that's all that matters. 1080p performance is one part of it, if Intel go Intel pricing again people are still going to buy AMD instead. They can't charge the same as their 10 core part for this and get away with it.
It'll be faster than AMD's last gen offerings at 1080p at what level? Frame rates no one cares about because it's past any monitor refresh rate? AMD CPUs already pump out such high FPS at 1080p that the GPU will be the limit for generations to come. I'm sitting here with a 3900X + RTX 3080, guess which one is the limit long before the other?
That reminds me of the whole retarded benching things at 720p to make Intel look good when in reality results of that didn't actually scale to 1080p and beyond, and Intel knew it wouldn't but they still pushed for those BS benchmarks.
brogadget
Even 1,5v is Intel spec. conform, so what? > 90°c should be no problem. It hits CPU lifespan a bit, but that´s all. I believe Intel still wants to sell their "Cryo Cooling" TEC system more frequently to overclockers or enthuisiasts......
tunejunky
chances are but the numbers are still suspect. if down to 90-95 at reg volts then i would say it was hot... but this is an outlier
cucaulay malkin
200w cooler to cool a 250w cpu
intel wants the Dutch to drown by the time they get their 7nm operational apparently
tunejunky
i know we have a new level of hedt's, but as both Intel and AMD's mainstream top cpu's deliver beyond what my old x99/x299 performed at we should reconsider our advice to anyone buying an eight core plus cpu regarding cooling.
AMD recommends at least a 240mm aio, but that's not even close to being enough for the 5900x and 5950x. a 360mm aio should be the minimum on the 5900x and a custom loop on the 5950x.
why would Intel be any different when we know they're at a less efficient place as far as heat/power go.
idk what the oems other than alienware will do. alienware will just slap more or bigger rads on it and call it a day as their clients are enthusiasts without the skill.
cucaulay malkin
really ? I thought you can cool a stock 5900x on something like a u12s
it's 105w isn't it ?
Ricepudding
Man Temps are getting crazy, I noticed massively the temp jump from going from a 2700k at 4.6ghz all core to the 8700k Stock, the temps rose massively, had to undervolt my CPU to find a reasonable level of temps.
If even water cooling can't keep CPU's in check then something needs to change, maybe bigger heatspreads and bigger cooling mounts to go with it, spread that heat over more surface.
Or software needs to work well with muti-core at lower clock speeds so its not having insane voltage all the time going through it
chainy
Dude, i delidded my 8700K and put liquid metal on it, it was pretty easy to do, went from high 80's to 55C while under gaming load with 4.8ghz all core, even with prime it hardly goes over 60C now.
