Core i9-11900K: Overclocker hits 7 GHz mark (at 1.873 volts)

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Core i9-11900K: Overclocker hits 7 GHz mark (at 1.873 volts) on our message forum
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/282/282473.jpg
"but ryzen" in 3...2...1....
data/avatar/default/avatar06.webp
Can you actually run a benchmark at least at those speeds? Or is just boot up and have cpu-z validate?
data/avatar/default/avatar17.webp
Just buy a 5950x and save yourself the mining farm sized power bill
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/164/164033.jpg
cucaulay malkin:

"but ryzen" in 3...2...1....
Well it took only you to mention that first 😀
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/238/238382.jpg
When will cpu's hit these speeds without overclocking? 5 years? 10 years?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/282/282473.jpg
"just buy a 5950x" 🙄
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/180/180081.jpg
Hot 😀
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/69/69564.jpg
Ah yes, Intel's bulldozer moment
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/246/246564.jpg
At least someone has found a use for that chip.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/282/282473.jpg
KissSh0t:

When will cpu's hit these speeds without overclocking? 5 years? 10 years?
there are better ways to improve performance. number of cores,core to core latency,core to memory latency,cache sizes,ipc improvements, APIs (!).
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/38/38026.jpg
ViperAnaf:

who gives a crap about liquid nitrogen oc....
Somebody whom may break their arm after crystallisation.
data/avatar/default/avatar21.webp
KissSh0t:

When will cpu's hit these speeds without overclocking? 5 years? 10 years?
most likely never, increasing clocks is not very effective way to boost performance , it doesnt scale well .
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/220/220755.jpg
ViperAnaf:

who gives a crap about liquid nitrogen oc....
It is like saying "who cares about F1 engines", we won't be using ln2 overclocked cpus for our daily tasks, but it is important to explore the limits of actual silicon, and it is kinda fun also
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/284/284177.jpg
cucaulay malkin:

"but ryzen" in 3...2...1....
@7ghz it's still slower than stock ryzen!....just had to 😀
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/282/282473.jpg
Airbud:

@7ghz it's still slower than stock ryzen!....just had to 😀
I was thinking more like "my ryzen would do 10 points more at 7ghz"
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/132/132389.jpg
cucaulay malkin:

I was thinking more like "my ryzen would do 10 points more at 7ghz"
My Ryzen doesn't need a state of the art liquid nitrogen setup in order to sound like it's not garbage compared to its own previous generation 😀
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/201/201426.jpg
cucaulay malkin:

"but ryzen" in 3...2...1....
Cool story fangirl.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/273/273822.jpg
So nobody even reached over 7ghz yet? Over 7ghz has been done before on Intel mainstream CPU in the past, quite comfortably. Nothing new here.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/225/225084.jpg
Clock speeds might actually go way down with 5nm CPUs but like others have said improvements in core count and latency, caches and other factors like newer chipsets like AM5 with DDR5 and PCIe5 could see big leaps in performance.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/268/268422.jpg
tty8k:

If I look at that Apple chip, anything Intel / AMD is just a fecking joke.
you aren't looking hard enough