Core i9-10900KF performance leaks in 3DMark Time Spy - Ryzen 9 3900X Level Perf
Click here to post a comment for Core i9-10900KF performance leaks in 3DMark Time Spy - Ryzen 9 3900X Level Perf on our message forum
ruthan
So its Core i9 9900K performance +10%, because of + 100 Mhz faster base clock, more agressive turbo clock, 2 more cores and probably TDP getting out of the roof..
Should we just stand up and clap our hands?
asturur
If it gets to 10% i think is a lot. I expect more or less 9900k + 3% in single thread.
alanm
There should be a vulnerabilities benchmark. The one with least exploits breached will be the one to buy.
fantaskarsef
Maybe it's just me, but shouldn't the 10900KF be faster than the 3900X by a larger margin? Sure it supports more threads than just one but... doesn't look like the best gaming CPU this time around... differences within the margin of error.
H83
Well we can´t make any conclusions of a single benchmark, specially a synthetic one.
JamesSneed
... of an unknown origin. Who knows this could be running with exotic cooling to keep boost high.
rl66
As the actual intel processor that this one should replace, is already at an higher price than the Ryzen... i feel a bit negative about this intel.
Exept the price it is nice to see the new gen, but the war will be on price per perf...
Reddoguk
Just a guess but i imagine this will hit 140w under full load. The 9900KS is already listed as 127w. While the 3900X is 105w with 2 more cores.
squalles
its a just synthetic test, you can see how its wrong when the test shows 3900x ahead 9900ks, and in real world games its worst than 8700k
Aura89
Games are not a determining factor for speed of a cpu.
That's not to say if how a cpu performs in games is what matters to you then don't pay attention to that, but again, the determining factor for how fast an entire cpu is, is not determined by any game.
Kaleid
Aren't these still 14nm? Then those numbers are very optimistic.
squalles
wtf? all depends what your want do with your pc, obviously if i want play games, i9 are faster to me
Aura89
You apparently didn't read what i wrote, but hey, i did read what you wrote, which wasn't a reply to anyone talking about gaming, just a claim that this "synthetic benchmark is wrong because...... games" nonsense.
If all you care about is games...Great! But that doesn't magically make a benchmark wrong because all you care about is games.
fry178
@squalles
maybe google the difference between synthetic and real world benches. just because they dont show what YOU want to see, doesn't make it invalid or not needed.
it depends on what you want to compare, as in this case pure cpu numbers without getting affected by other things a game puts on the cpu/gpu (physx/audio etc),
or to eliminate false stats because of "2 explosions/5 more NPC" showing up in a scene.
completely ignoring that someone that buys a +8 C cpu for gaming doesnt know crap, others might be interested to have their work computer also be their gaming (able) rig.
then the amd would still make more sense, as the saved money vs the intel can get you a much better gpu.
Bo Alenkaer
And the price.... $1000 ?
mbk1969
Recently I did upgrade to i9-9820X and being sceptical about my rusty assembling skills (last rig was assembled 8 years ago) I did stress testing. I used Intel Extreme Tuning Utility and CPU-Z. All 10 cores (I disabled HT) went to their maximum turbo clocks (all different since BIOS and OS are tuned to use most favourite cores feature) for the whole span of tests and temperatures stayed near 60C (with air cooling).
fry178
Then why buy a high core HT chip in the first place?
could have easily gone with 6 C running HT for that.
squalles
you cant spend more on intel, the i7 10700k are 8 cores and 16 threads in same price of 3800x but very better than him, 10900k are 2 cores less than 3900x but rendering same on multi thread because have many better single core performance, so, the better choice is obvious, or choice are amd x570 and your processor and depends of software be improved to use all your cores, or you choice the intel and have the same or better performance even if when software cant be optimized
if you want does amd performs close you need a x570 to hit 3733mhz on amd and its need spend much more money, because x570 cost more than z390, mainly the decents motherboards to hit the boost clock announced
mbk1969
In case you were replying to me, the number of cores was not the point of my comment. I was on 6 cores (with HT) CPU before upgrade.
fry178
No, meant why buy a cpu with HT, if your not using it?
