Free extra AMD Ryzen ZEN2 Performance: ClockTuner for Ryzen (CTR by 1USMUS)

thesebastian

2020-08-25 13:12

Thanks to this guy's calc. I managed to push my Micron E die RAM from 3200 XMP (73-75ns latency) to 3600 CL16-19-19 and still at 1.35v (68.9~ns latency) by using a Manual import + Calculate Safe. And reduce stock SoC voltage from 1.2v to 1.05v with a fabric clock of 1800Mhz (in my ASRock B450 ITX motherboard using VDDG, VDDP and SOC voltages, aligned with DRAM Calculator).

#5821601

mgilbert

2020-08-25 14:41

This is an interesting tool for those who overclock as a hobby, but seriously, are you going to consider your system 100% stable when this program only tests for stability for a few minutes, and with only one program, for each change it makes??? It takes hours and hours of stability testing with several programs, each loading your CPU differently, to be sure a system is truly stable. I'll leave my 3700x at stock. An extra few percentage points in benchmarks will not make a truly noticeable difference in normal daily use, unless you're the type to set in front of your computer with a stopwatch, timing everything it does.

#5821619

Pictus

2020-08-25 15:33

1usmus is the MAN! Creator of masterpieces!! 1usmus Ryzen DRAM Calculator is excellent and Micron E-die is Ryzen best friend... Here with the Calculator both the Crucial(batch 2020) 2x8 3000MHz BL8G30C15U4B and 2x16 3200MHz BL16G32C16U4R were able to reach 3733MHz 1.37V on the Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS and MSI B450 TomaHawk MAX, but on the MSI I don't know which is the true voltage value because the displayed value was higher than the one defined in the BIOS. They can even go further, but above 3733MHz seems too much in the edge for my taste with Ryzen 3000 series. http://i.imgur.com/pYwlHjMt.png http://i.imgur.com/RL4kpWRt.png Here the 3600(BF 2004 PGT) runs all cores locked at 4.2GHz voltages up to +- 1.1625V No crashes with Prim95 and AVX2 enabled... I am curious to try the new program and create a new non locked core profile. http://i.imgur.com/IQGpUuSt.png http://i.imgur.com/vV4E8Lvt.png http://i.imgur.com/ADGWZFet.png

#5821632

HybOj

2020-08-25 16:22

Thank you Negativ, enjoy supporting financially the company you dislike.

#5821642

anub1s18

2020-08-25 17:02

would be intersted in trying this as a undervolting utility (performance wise my 3900X seems fine...efficiency wise as well but i'm under the impression less volts/powerdraw should only be able to lead to instability and not long term damage).

#5821662

Robbo9999

2020-08-25 17:59

Sounds good & would be fun to play about with!

#5821672

Silva

2020-08-25 18:59

anub1s18:

would be intersted in trying this as a undervolting utility (performance wise my 3900X seems fine...efficiency wise as well but i'm under the impression less volts/powerdraw should only be able to lead to instability and not long term damage).

Every die is different, yours can be on the edge and not be able to undervolt well, or could take a good chunk of heat out of your system.

#5821756

bernek

2020-08-26 01:05

Cant wait to try it for sure 😀

#5822349

anub1s18

2020-08-27 17:08

Silva:

Every die is different, yours can be on the edge and not be able to undervolt well, or could take a good chunk of heat out of your system.

true, i am already running -0.125 but i feel i'm getting ignored in my request for less voltage. i did find a difference in temp and cinebench score between -0.100 and -0.125 not so much with -0.15, all worked, all booted, all seemed to show the same voltage idle/load but in the case of -0.125 it did drop it's temp slightly and managed the highest cinebench i've gotten out of it yet (not really that interested in cinebench scores in general but am using it as a quick indication of is this hurting or helping performance)

#5822372