#4496616

Hilbert Hagedoorn

Administrator

2013-01-09 14:02

In case anyone is getting ilivid crapware downloaded, download benchmark directly from here instead

Thanks XBEAST, I've updated the download with a non-ilivid version.

#4496641

BetA

2013-01-09 14:42

hmmm, it says v.3 here , not v.4.1. ????????

#4496649

Hilbert Hagedoorn

Administrator

2013-01-09 14:48

hmmm, it says v.3 here , not v.4.1. ????????

4.1 here .... http://www.guru3d.com/index.php?ct=files&action=file&id=162

#4496665

BetA

2013-01-09 15:01

4.1 here .... http://www.guru3d.com/index.php?ct=files&action=file&id=162

hmmm, ok , thanks, i guess ill just dll it agin..haha lets see what happens... be right back with some Scores..:banana:

#4496672

BetA

2013-01-09 15:10

There we go, my first run...My Q9550 rocks...:infinity: http://www.abload.de/img/unbenannt9xpor.jpg

#4496710

WhiteLightning

Moderator

2013-01-09 16:00

http://img202.imageshack.us/img202/8177/captureuh.jpg

#4496717

BrainDedd

2013-01-09 16:15

My little stock Q9450 http://s9.postimage.org/p758rfqlb/Capture.jpg

#4496771

pcgamers

2013-01-09 17:17

3770k @ 4.6GHz http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/1456/63216941.jpg

#4496775

Raider0001

2013-01-09 17:28

FX 8120 stock http://www.pixelshack.us/images/15f74zxg3u01ojoukwb_thumb.jpg

#4496777

mikeysg

2013-01-09 17:28

Here's mine, CPU at stock speed, did note that all cores (including HT) were ramped up during benchmark.... http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v333/mikeysg/Blackhole_zps924204f0.jpg Refuses to run on my FX rig though.....get a stop responding message.

#4496778

Dazz

2013-01-09 17:28

http://img580.imageshack.us/img580/4681/benchze.png

#4496862

BLEH!

2013-01-09 19:18

9024 total, 5574 multi, 3480 single. This is with RAM at 800 MHz though and stock core clocks.

#4496908

DLD

2013-01-09 20:01

''stopoped responding...'' before even got started... Tried to run the .exe in a compatibility mode(s) - still no go.. Macnine is SandyB 2400, 2x2GB DDR3 1600MHz, win7 64bit, everything is up-to-date (regular official updates). @smileman: "after I seen many results, I can see AMD is always in disadvantage in terms of the integer pass. I might try to look for fixes in the next version." Please, don't look for fixes - AMD is itself an disadvantaged hardware. It is quite normal that Intel CPUs run this test much better than Advanced Marketing Deceivers' CPUs (like any other test out there)...:banana:

#4496970

-Tj-

2013-01-09 21:08

Here is mine at 3.64Ghz Total score: 7827 multi: 4012 single: 3815 http://www.abload.de/thumb/blackholebench3.64ghz54f17.png

#4497226

mikeysg

2013-01-10 04:43

Upped my CPU to 4.375ghz, and got this- http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v333/mikeysg/13k.jpg

#4497234

elkosith

2013-01-10 05:40

4552 1732 Multi 2820 Single i5 2430M @2.4

#4497250

Mannerheim

2013-01-10 06:34

I can get many different results. every run is different. 6200pt to~7000pt integet and floating points from 30k to over 50k. Stock and no others programs on screen.

#4497269

Agent-A01

2013-01-10 07:49

http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/8120/20390935.png

#4497273

Agent-A01

2013-01-10 07:55

What's up with that score?

Nice aint it? I got a good 2700k, much better than my voltage hungry 2600k

#4497279

Agent-A01

2013-01-10 08:02

Just wondering why the font is different from all the other screen shots. No offense, just my naturally suspicious nature. 🙂 I'm only running at 4.2. Might bump it up to 4.5 or 4.6 just for giggles. The extra threads helps my scores.

i think the reason font is different is due me deleting all the fonts that arent required in the windows fonts. maybe its defaulting to something else.