BaseMark GPU Benchmark v1.2.3 download

Benchmarks & Demo's 179 Updated by Hilbert Hagedoorn

Click here to post a comment for BaseMark GPU Benchmark v1.2.3 download on our message forum
#5765879
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/260/260048.jpg
Seems to be heavily biased towards NVIDIA.
#5765883
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/181/181063.jpg
Great review - as always - I see one conclusion from it: AMD really needs an enthusiast card - let's hope that it will happen this year so that we will have competition at this level.
#5765885
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/16/16662.jpg
Administrator
jbscotchman:

I find the lack of 1660 Ti disturbing.
We've can't have you running around here at the forums all disturbed of course 🙂 ... so I'll add that card for you later today.
#5765887
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/248/248994.jpg
Looking at the chart, you'd think AMD's OpenGL compatibility was implemented through some emulation/conversion method.
#5765915
data/avatar/default/avatar37.webp
Nice benchmark review from Guru3D. A possible addition to add to future GPU reviews since it targets normalized results across different API.
#5765919
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
Nvidia basemark.
#5765921
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/259/259995.jpg
Thanks HH nice one as always 🙂 Happy to see my new Ryzen 3600 +2070 ( non super ) beats the I9 🙂
#5765926
data/avatar/default/avatar17.webp
Welcome to Nvidia testmark... We all know how AMD and vulkan and dx12 perform, if done right the performance will be really good. Not seen here not even anything close to that comon a R7 on the same performance as a 2060... Dosent make any sense, its like we are looking at unreal engine before dx12 was implemented. The review is good. Now the Benqmark performance needs to be put to the side until it makes any sense.
#5765935
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/248/248291.jpg
Seems to be a bad way to benchmark graphics cards....
#5765938
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/220/220214.jpg
Nice, i was looking at first three graphs and trying to compare them and thinking "put them all on ONE graph 😡"... and then last graph appeared 😀
#5765939
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/274/274592.jpg
Just tested this on my 3900x and 5700XT system. Latest 2020.2.2 drivers installed. Windows 10 OpenGL ~4800 Windows 10 Vulkan ~8700 Linux Manjaro (5.6rc3 kernel) OpenGL ~7800 Linux Manjaro (5.6rc3 kernel) Vulkan ~ 8100 I think there is something very wrong with the windows version of the Radeon OpenGL Drivers.
#5765940
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/274/274592.jpg
Oh, and those Windows 10 scores... were with a +50% power target. The Linux ones were just stock.
#5765950
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/79/79740.jpg
Basemark looks like its going to be very controversial in the days, weeks ahead. I guess we have to wait for AMD to comment or offer an explanation of some sort.
#5765956
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/232/232504.jpg
I'm seriously excited for my GPU. Best buy ever did. I got a 1660 Super with 2 Fans only 209 euros and the core clock without any OC stays steadily at 1935Mhz. But even more so because it's hand in hand with the 980Ti while extremely more efficient. Playing games at 1080p, 75Hz with VSync and FPS limited at 75, the card rarely works over 80% at full settings. Meanwhile since I plagued the card, it found normally my monitor's EDID settings with HMDI cable and locks at 75Hz PC Native. This was always a problem before ( HDMI cable was locking at limited colours, HDTV Native and 60Hz instead ).
#5765970
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/169/169351.jpg
Askmyteapot:

Just tested this on my 3900x and 5700XT system. Latest 2020.2.2 drivers installed. Windows 10 OpenGL ~4800 Windows 10 Vulkan ~8700 Linux Manjaro (5.6rc3 kernel) OpenGL ~7800 Linux Manjaro (5.6rc3 kernel) Vulkan ~ 8100 I think there is something very wrong with the windows version of the Radeon OpenGL Drivers.
The OpenGL drivers on Windows are just compatibility mode drivers, it's been that way for many years.
#5766016
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/115/115710.jpg
AMD's OpenGL windows drivers are truly trash... it's quite impressive how well NVIDIA's OpenGL driver performs in comparison.
#5766022
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/271/271258.jpg
Nice results, could you please add GTX 1060 6G version on the tests? I own one and it still one of the most popular cards around. Best Regards, Will
#5766093
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/246/246171.jpg
jbscotchman:

Nvidia has always dominated in OpenGL.
On Windows, yeah. AMD's Windows OpenGL drivers have always been medicore. On Linux with properly-ported titles , Nvidia doesn't have such a distinct win. For example, the 5700XT on average is slightly slower than the 1080Ti on Linux (sometimes faster, usually a little slower), but on these charts posted here, the 5700XT is practically an entire performance tier lower.
#5766127
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/80/80129.jpg
slicer:

Comment from HH conclusion We might end up using Basemark GPU in graphics card test suite as it gives a really nice and quick comparison between APIs that you can test at home yourself as well. What the actual frack?? It is clearly a fucked up benchmark and not reflecting real world performance between cards. Looking that AMD cards that are in reality on par with RTX2070 Super, are here losing to RTX 2060! HH conclusion... Lets use that in our testing! Mind blown.
Where exactly is it not reflecting real world performance? AMD's OpenGL drivers on Windows have been notoriously bad and thus you get scenarios where their cards lose to a 2060. That's real world. Simply google "AMD openGL performance" and literally every thread or even posts by developers like this one: https://community.amd.com/thread/218932 Is that their performance is awful. As far as Vulkan and DX12, quickly comparing to techpowerup averages between a few cards and Hilbert's other reviews - it looks be on par with everything else. So I don't get why this would be a poor benchmark, looks fine.
#5766128
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/156/156133.jpg
Moderator
Askmyteapot:

Just tested this on my 3900x and 5700XT system. Latest 2020.2.2 drivers installed. Windows 10 OpenGL ~4800 Windows 10 Vulkan ~8700 Linux Manjaro (5.6rc3 kernel) OpenGL ~7800 Linux Manjaro (5.6rc3 kernel) Vulkan ~ 8100 I think there is something very wrong with the windows version of the Radeon OpenGL Drivers.
AMD Open GL drivers are not multithreaded like Nvidia Open GL drivers are in Windows.

Next Page