ASUS Offers ROG Strix XG32VQ 32-Inch WQHD Curved Gaming Monitor

Published by

Click here to post a comment for ASUS Offers ROG Strix XG32VQ 32-Inch WQHD Curved Gaming Monitor on our message forum
#5493950
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/233/233167.jpg
Would be great if there will be G-sync variants.
#5494098
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/115/115462.jpg
I'm not a fan at all of curved displays with 16:9 aspect ratio... also, the size is a bit too big too for that resolution. 1440p is best at 27", or maybe 30 (though I believe only 1600p displays came with this size).
#5494151
data/avatar/default/avatar30.webp
Solfaur:

I'm not a fan at all of curved displays with 16:9 aspect ratio... also, the size is a bit too big too for that resolution. 1440p is best at 27", or maybe 30 (though I believe only 1600p displays came with this size).
My Dell U2711 is 2560 x 1440 60Hz and 7 years old. Dell also sold a U3011 which was the 30" version which was 2560 x 1600. I'm not seeing any exciting progress with the NVidia card & monitor scenario.
#5494166
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/115/115462.jpg
ChisChas:

My Dell U2711 is 2560 x 1440 60Hz and 7 years old. Dell also sold a U3011 which was the 30" version which was 2560 x 1600. I'm not seeing any exciting progress with the NVidia card & monitor scenario.
I too have a U2711 for the same time as you and was thinking precisely about the U3011 😀... fantastic IPS (not the backlight bleeding messes that are out nowadays), it just sucks that it doesn't have higher refresh, that is pretty much the only reason why I want to upgrade.
#5494175
data/avatar/default/avatar38.webp
ChisChas:

My Dell U2711 is 2560 x 1440 60Hz and 7 years old. Dell also sold a U3011 which was the 30" version which was 2560 x 1600. I'm not seeing any exciting progress with the NVidia card & monitor scenario.
I was using DELL UWP3008 10 years ago,so I fully agree with you that we are lacking progress in monitor development.
Abc666:

Na, Gsync isnt needed at 144hz or above. I've had gsync on my previous display, now i have 144hz freesync with a gtx1070, i see no difference in tearing at all, as in i dont see the tearing at 144hz. The bonus of not having Gsync, less cost, better image quality on desktop(no scanlines) and no weird blinking of buttons and stuff in games. If you ask me, gsync is obsolete, unless you use displays at 100hz or below i dont see the idea of sync tech like freesync or gsync. At 144 and above, no sync tech please.
You are forgeting one very important thing, and thats freesync/gsync main advantage is for FPS bellow set monitor refresh rates. Even 1080Ti is not able handle new games at WQHD and 144 Hz.
#5494208
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/201/201426.jpg
Solfaur:

I'm not a fan at all of curved displays with 16:9 aspect ratio... also, the size is a bit too big too for that resolution. 1440p is best at 27", or maybe 30 (though I believe only 1600p displays came with this size).
Exactly. Any 16:9 monitor curved is just stupid personally.
#5494209
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/231/231931.jpg
Abc666:

Na, Gsync isnt needed at 144hz or above. I've had gsync on my previous display, now i have 144hz freesync with a gtx1070, i see no difference in tearing at all, as in i dont see the tearing at 144hz. The bonus of not having Gsync, less cost, better image quality on desktop(no scanlines) and no weird blinking of buttons and stuff in games. If you ask me, gsync is obsolete, unless you use displays at 100hz or below i dont see the idea of sync tech like freesync or gsync. At 144 and above, no sync tech please.
Just because you can't see a difference doesn't mean I can't. You still get noticeable tearing even at 144hz. Just as you can see tearing, you'll also see 'microstuttering'. As for the rest of those issues you listed like better iq and weird blinking, that's a monitor specific issue with no relation to gsync