#6057946

fry178

2022-10-06 11:19

@tty8k until their drivers arent all or nothing for install, and they have a shadow-play equivalent, i will stay on Nv. i dont buy model numbers, but what i have the funds for so any price difference is not really relevant to me, much more if i can get a LC version/block for it.

#6057958

Meathelix1

2022-10-06 12:14

Guess I will be waiting for the 4090 ti or the 5000 series. Even without driver support, I don't expect much more than what was posted here. Is that performance really worth $2300 AUD.... nope not a bloody chance? Their NDAs that are not allowing reviewers to review and show us before the release just go to show Nvidia doesn't want true numbers released before the cards.

#6057992

NewTRUMP Order

2022-10-06 13:47

It's all 中国人 to me. I will just wait till the real results come out. No sense in going all crazy over inaccurate results. I do however agree with my European friends that the pricing is just outrageous for them. Price to performance has also lost all meaning for them. Waiting for results--------> https://media4.giphy.com/media/YKCXqaSzmaDde/200w.gif?cid=ecf05e47fhhd2842a8b4boetd0q47x762lieli2sqodzan2c&rid=200w.gif&ct=g

#6058003

moab600

2022-10-06 14:10

nVidia sure loves to manipulate numbers... They should get with intel in the same bed and manipulate numbers together, so much for 2-4x over 3090ti...

#6058342

Crazy Joe

2022-10-07 15:08

So, I don't have the numbers here for my RTX 3090 for FireStrike Ultra (have not tested it for my new setup). For Timespy Extreme, I had a 9533 graphics Score, so that would mean that this card scores 1.47 times higher than my RTX 3090 (EVGA RTX 3090 XC3 Gaming Ultra). I also have the numbers for the Xess test still in my head (as I ran it a couple a days ago). I got 56.x for the normal test and 75.x for Xess enabled one. This means that this card is about 1.33 to 1.35 times faster than my RTX 3090

#6058352

Undying

2022-10-07 15:37

Imagine nvidia wasnt greedy af and we lived in perfect world this card would cost 649-699$.

#6058354

cucaulay malkin

2022-10-07 15:42

tty8k:

Great, that makes my 6900xt at same level or better than 4080 12G, except I have 16GB vram and I only paid 800e for it vs (estimate) 1300e.

correct

#6058378

mohiuddin

2022-10-07 17:02

Undying:

Imagine nvidia wasnt greedy af and we lived in perfect world this card would cost 649-699$.

Even our expectations got contaminated with NVIDIA's greed. In a prefect world RTX4090 should have cost 650$

#6058386

Spets

2022-10-07 17:38

mohiuddin:

Even our expectations got contaminated with NVIDIA's greed. In a prefect world RTX4090 should have cost 650$

$650 for a 76 billion transistor chip? Might be a little too ambitious 🙂

#6058388

Denial

2022-10-07 17:39

Spets:

$650 for a 76 billion transistor chip? Might be a little too ambitious 🙂

Yeah, why not just make it 7 cents lol