#5845879

Undying

2020-10-23 15:42

Title should be every ryzen 5000 cpu takes the lead.

#5845888

Denial

2020-10-23 16:03

karma777police:

No thanks.

"Amd is not better, it's not better!" Karma777Police proclaims as he slowly shrinks and transforms into a corn cob.

#5845893

cryohellinc

2020-10-23 16:14

This and This [spoiler]http://img0.joyreactor.cc/pics/post/full/Doge-Lore-intel-AMD-5943314.jpeg [/spoiler]

#5845894

JamesSneed

2020-10-23 16:16

Whoa. AMD is killing it.

#5845910

Tsenng

2020-10-23 16:59

Now we are talking!!! Im gonna upgrade to that sweet cpu as i don't need anything more hardcore. Already ordered my new 32inch monitor and just waiting for the 6000 Radeon series now...will be my first radeon GPU again since my dual gpu hmm 7890 was it??? Exciting times ahead!

#5845912

Jagman

2020-10-23 17:02

On that same scale the 5950X would score 3722, if my maths is right 😀

#5845917

Richard Nutman

2020-10-23 17:09

The chip speeds really bother me. If the dual chiplet 16 core 5950X can hit 4.9Ghz turbo, why on earth can the single chiplet 8 core 5800X not reach 4.9Ghz also? Why is the 6 core 5600X limited to 4.5Ghz turbo? Makes no sense. Surely less cores is less heat?

#5845918

Jagman

2020-10-23 17:10

Binning.

#5845924

Richard Nutman

2020-10-23 17:18

Yeah but they should use the same binned chips for the 5800 as the 5950. It's annoying if you want the best single threaded speed, you have to buy the chip with the max number of cores that you may not need.

#5845927

Jagman

2020-10-23 17:21

Well they're only 100MHz apart so you'd be unlucky not to be able to tickle the 5800X upto 4.9GHz, with a minor bit of effort 🙂

#5845930

JamesSneed

2020-10-23 17:25

Richard Nutman:

The chip speeds really bother me. If the dual chiplet 16 core 5950X can hit 4.9Ghz turbo, why on earth can the single chiplet 8 core 5800X not reach 4.9Ghz also? Why is the 6 core 5600X limited to 4.5Ghz turbo? Makes no sense. Surely less cores is less heat?

All down to binning like @Jagman said. Depending on luck you may get one that can hit 4.8Ghz. I would love to see a 5850X binned to hit 4.9-5Ghz.

#5845932

Borys

2020-10-23 17:31

With sure we are living excited times... "the slowest Ryzen 5000 beat the best Intel processor" Yes... it was a long way to see this. Now, all Intel fanboys must say with me "AMD is the new GAMING KING CPU" Intel now is for noobs! Congratulations AMD... with sure was a hard job... but now the rewards will come! I

#5845934

Richard Nutman

2020-10-23 17:32

Yeah, a 5600XT that can hit 4.9Ghz would be a tremendous gaming chip. 🙂

#5845935

southamptonfc

2020-10-23 17:32

Intel leaked press release if this Ryzen "leak" turns out to be true https://i.redd.it/sjhgo7b5bm341.jpg

#5845940

Kool64

2020-10-23 17:50

you'd have to be crazy to buy a 5600X though. With the 10400F being the new "budget" king. I guess you'd get one to have the fastest of the slowest???

#5845960

Stormyandcold

2020-10-23 18:55

Boss, the article says boost clock of 4.6Ghz, but, the chart says 4.5Ghz. Anyway, this cpu looks like an excellent product.

#5845969

Ryu5uzaku

2020-10-23 19:11

Kool64:

you'd have to be crazy to buy a 5600X though. With the 10400F being the new "budget" king. I guess you'd get one to have the fastest of the slowest???

I cant see your point. The 5600x is going to be good bit faster since it competes with intels that are 5ghz range instead of the 4.3 that this one is.

#5845971

panogr

2020-10-23 19:16

I hope this are real scores 😉

#5845987

mrvco

2020-10-23 20:18

Can't wait. If the 5950x is really exceeding 5GHz on its boost clock alone, one has to wonder what the OC headroom is on the other Zen3 procs.

#5846005

Kool64

2020-10-23 21:28

Ryu5uzaku:

I cant see your point. The 5600x is going to be good bit faster since it competes with intels that are 5ghz range instead of the 4.3 that this one is.

perhaps I would just feel weird paying $300 for six cores.