AMD Announces Radeon R9 Fury Graphics Card

Published by

Click here to post a comment for AMD Announces Radeon R9 Fury Graphics Card on our message forum
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/164/164033.jpg
I am having hard time with 390x vs Fury Strix they are pretty much 7-13% apart, with 390x custom you are talking about even smaller difference. Where is all the power going from the added 768 shaders. Same for Fury X that has 1280 more shaders it simply isn't utilized. Fury X is only 10-19% faster then 290x(sorry 390x) it totally should be closer to 25% all in all faster but nope. The difference between something like 290x and 280x is already over ~23% 390x adds to that and it grows to ~30% (even tho 290x and 390x are the same card). Then Fury X gives really minimal boost with 30% more shaders then 390x ๐Ÿ˜€ and even the Fury having way more shaders gives nothing really in real world applications kind of really inefficient.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/105/105985.jpg
290x the card that keeps ticking and running very well for its price,sorta too well for fury sake
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/105/105985.jpg
yeah and its a p0wer hog too but that don't make it a bad card ๐Ÿค“ nothing say's hot and porky like my 480's and I like them too
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/164/164033.jpg
Cept that it runs waaaaaaaaaaay too hot.
It runs cool enough ๐Ÿ˜‰ after changing the thermal paste it runs around 78 max when clocked to 1100/1400 on the msi gaming twinfrzr cooler ๐Ÿ˜ฏ Now the stock cooler for sure runs way too hot ๐Ÿ˜€