Alleged specifications of AMD AM5 emerge: slightly bigger than Intels counterpart and DDR5
Click here to post a comment for Alleged specifications of AMD AM5 emerge: slightly bigger than Intels counterpart and DDR5 on our message forum
anticupidon
AM4 gave us unmatched generation support, let's hope that the forthcoming AM5 will provide the same support across CPU generations.
Evildead666
It's not like AM5 can't support PCIe 5, just maybe not in the beginning.
It probably consumes quite a lot of power as well at the moment.
It's just an I/O Die change.
The only place we're maxing out PCIe4 is in the Storage area, and even then, i'm not sure it's being maxed out anywhere other than Benchmarks, and maybe consoles.
What i'm more interested in, is what the extra Pins bring.
I'm not sure if DDR5 needs more pins, and it shouldn't need more power pins than AM4, so are we getting more PCIe lanes, or something ?
Undying
Pcie5 will probably come with future refreshes. Not that we saturated pcie4 yet.
Im kinda glad i still didnt upgrade my 2700x. Saving up for a new platform would be smartest thing than getting an overpriced zen3 cpu. Next year will be interesting indeed.
fellix
Jawnys
asturur
i hope i can finally gete a 5800x at a good price.
Aztec2Step
cucaulay malkin
finally retiring pins
took them long enough
schmidtbag
I couldn't care less that it's still on PCIe 4.0. It's going to be many years until that isn't enough for desktop use. Sure, I think some M.2 drives could squeeze a little more performance, but honestly, even PCIe 3.0 drives can be faster than what most real-world applications demand. SAM can theoretically take advantage of more bandwidth, but so far we still don't seem anywhere close to GPUs being bottlenecked by PCIe 4.0 bandwidth.
Get me to wonder... why now? AMD has done LGA in the past (for servers). Seem to me it's just an easy way to trigger RMAs.
fry178
@Undying
so MSRP is now "overpriced"?
(ignoring that almost every shop i checked, has it on sale around 40-50$ below that).
GSDragoon
Kaarme
schmidtbag
RED.Misfit
GamerNerves
MSI B350M Mortar). When you check what various mobos actually support, you realize the upgrade path is not that convincing. The thing is, VRM requirements rose up like expected when moving to the next generation, so for example B350 mobos will not do well with the best possible Ryzen 5000 (hence, no support). In addition, my B350 board only offers beta BIOS to support Ryzen 3000 series, which has admittedly been pretty much problem free, but in the end is support like this really proper? Would be different if AMD let manufacturers offer support freely or not, but they indeed hassled with AGESA updates, so offering longer support was not a valid option. Now we are left wondering if the new socket will offer any better support.
I'm still glad we got what we got and I bet some people upgraded from 1000 series to 3000, but other upgrade options really don't net that high gains. Maybe going from R5 2600/3600 to 12+ core 5000 part could be a legit option (on 400 chipset), but you still won't have PCIE4, which is rather important already with next GPUs.
Summary: Any support is better than nothing, but often support of three gens forward is needed to really net proper gains without paying significantly more for the new CPU. I expect the first 'AM5' mobos to offer support at least one gen forward, but beyond that revising memory controller and stuff like that might prove problematic for further support.
How many people actually utilized the possibility? I upgraded from R7 1700 to R5 5600X, so I had to upgrade mobo as well (Aztec2Step